Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:118187 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 73736 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2022 22:17:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (76.75.200.58) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 4 Jul 2022 22:17:52 -0000 To: internals@lists.php.net Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 01:10:28 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0 Content-Language: en-GB References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 149.241.131.223 Subject: Re: [RFC][Vote] New Curl URL API From: marandall@php.net (Mark Randall) Message-ID: On 05/07/2022 00:34, Pierrick Charron wrote: > All recent discussions show that we are not even close to getting a > consensus on how the new CurlUrl OO API should be done. After changing my > mind 300 times in the last day, I decided to only propose the procedural > implementation that stays consistent with other functions of the ext/curl > to target 8.2. I know this is not the ideal scenario, but with 8.2 feature > freeze in two weeks, this is I think the only approach that will not put us > in a potentially bad/harmful situation for a better future with ext/curl. I'm voting no on this one based on the discussions from R11. The deadline being close is not a good enough reason to rush a change like this that will be difficult to unwind later. I agree with some of the other comments made that it would be preferable to come up with a more generic solution that can be used by multiple components rather than something specific to Curl. Mark Randall