Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:118119
Return-Path: <tim@bastelstu.be>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 47869 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2022 07:34:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5)
  by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 29 Jun 2022 07:34:02 -0000
Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98611180503
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 02:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-ASN: AS24940 176.9.0.0/16
X-Spam-Virus: No
X-Envelope-From: <tim@bastelstu.be>
Received: from chrono.xqk7.com (chrono.xqk7.com [176.9.45.72])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 02:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bastelstu.be;
	s=mail20171119; t=1656494710;
	bh=+RcjQ/s8B0tvmbZsfgGTAdX6iGUv/3iyVwFbT/ui0vQ=;
	h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From;
	b=PIicU7I13nJ/PpqH/2NIRZ5EhvMnE3GIHR0T95I2qQ3pZpZLM2cNiBQ4csZcOAAgL
	 gyJgYfPVVBI4xd+1f4Yk0F2GaDb12+628ESPoZKohe9O0F5FTf/8XlncBC55zF+9Nb
	 KLrsEnh2L7wNJQn2DAwT3+ipHt9nMWwxyZ7Sl3F007p2UlkdYmfOrl4fViErTBZwQH
	 BlnhwhaG+O+H3nAmPyrqMnp0jUwovd3F3SjC01KLDB4Tp6ee7wp7A9CHDznG/fiqte
	 4HwCJVKGRYUro2yaR1Ii9xpqhixKSOGseyTxUNNVY2c+MbPUFJ3SLpp5GVdjnX1h4b
	 QUs6JnZLgb1VQ==
Message-ID: <c20d4e35-a1a4-ab68-f3c5-08f0182ba099@bastelstu.be>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:25:08 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Guilliam Xavier <guilliam.xavier@gmail.com>, Go Kudo <g-kudo@colopl.co.jp>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
References: <CAMs36HcGzvwwTTU+nUO+U_M6o4qpOAHES7RbHEJWm6iot+-9=Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABTDVhA8K3LLZU9--a7vXxUE7wmVJEy8yeXZ9JjXfKVDBTOsHA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAC5V6gja7ZYX_aB+jrGu4ANsdfAVbZG9DYWYxNPSGwsu=JViGQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMs36HdH2n6asM7+3J+A0cxTQhNfxWFEgjx7oasy3LD85k4Cjw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAC5V6giAtyDtEybCJu=5keb=_xUh0pY05KsnZBu0+gciOYzw2g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC5V6giAtyDtEybCJu=5keb=_xUh0pY05KsnZBu0+gciOYzw2g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Under Discussion] Random Extension Improvement
From: tim@bastelstu.be (=?UTF-8?Q?Tim_D=c3=bcsterhus?=)

Hi

On 6/29/22 10:40, Guilliam Xavier wrote:
> pickArrayKeys [but the opposite would not be so], and I don't think
> that adding *both* methods to Randomizer is desirable either [better
> keep it simple/minimal]).

Agreed. I think it's best to leave pickArrayKeys() as it is within the 
current version of the RFC and NOT add pickArrayKey(). It's easy-ish to 
add new stuff. It's hard to take stuff away.

Best regards
Tim Düsterhus