Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:118085 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 37038 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2022 13:31:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 24 Jun 2022 13:31:28 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5657180539 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 08:21:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-ua1-f48.google.com (mail-ua1-f48.google.com [209.85.222.48]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 08:21:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ua1-f48.google.com with SMTP id n16so960873ual.12 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 08:21:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=basereality-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TGvD1Xsl1FIep5OVVSrtuLh9hHNF0SrWPfQ68ZmbqVw=; b=icAwLb57ipI4A/jt4KgP3HvT4uAI7TuZoRZbODVB1WQZqzy7W8lJGmCw+nceDhtumg 63FYyBK4XGQhd+qEWcRwyzCxeyP0ezzuncsU7ulHmn7xgNeR58oqpNQKlPEFlR91qLOt ah+oEK7POb/ra2XZiWBQ2AV1KxPNQfo7wptb5fUB4zJuc1uCK8owKemWyJHWvU26wZ3g SkLhBH6Y+W0jToF9ccQceQpfVmxBR/HwYk2DoKL8QV1d2lIFVumWCY1D4CtsTv1ZbARG zGADVRgS2HxRPps8VeRE7JsWMOXxxOgnpqb27f4wECRqxW9o5dHTaCopDyqyWwwfscZ2 Cexg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TGvD1Xsl1FIep5OVVSrtuLh9hHNF0SrWPfQ68ZmbqVw=; b=chpENQ5/lHO0vlVmPBVhMJzweU7ic/hcziZJf4gf1HrhT3UxJgqrAR7tb5Mo+i6cwP rYjKixpsuvIstba2SsXDH8ApMhZp6BCYrqR6aiNSgBYUvBBhff3QrlGVUxShXV7Z8QD1 ET7jtLVa6uhhva/jUR2dDs3Fvyxs9/VSgoFYOB6KQjGUmldmEbZM2BbSM3Fl8j+dbkMt e2fVwDi3dUSKGCYDxc3YA+TAqMeQWwFORsyGFwEMr89eTU9i/2MOa+4o0oH5JruHrkRM YGxxzo3fOAGPcyx3YWzsIlbzwZLwquVKUctTj0O9G3k5TypHB9n5scYbFq/ll3PO94HY aooQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora80CkPOfGmkuNsJBs2OB6tqcLGSe8HMo95SXAEmv0q0lW9OD08y ASpfZMpyIKeFc8HMdZ2AIqKT4D1wtU/mwfX31ITS5xOPFJjs8A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1v3Pf2P5BDCnOSvzp6UbEpAkRzJyb1N5hRKFqg+k7x9sY93+Y5isOJj2svJPJCnF/m90Rk382J+U+z2Q6OY9mM= X-Received: by 2002:a9f:3189:0:b0:35c:c458:ee11 with SMTP id v9-20020a9f3189000000b0035cc458ee11mr8288355uad.31.1656084088117; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 08:21:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 16:21:15 +0100 Message-ID: To: Larry Garfield Cc: php internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Under Discussion] PDO driver specific sub-classes From: Danack@basereality.com (Dan Ackroyd) On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 02:26, Larry Garfield wrote= : > > Any chance I could convince you to move away from the DSN for the factory= ? No. That sounds like a challenge for someone who knows about (and cares about) that problem. There's also not enough time to have that discussion before feature freeze. > * "This RFC does not propose adding subclasses for any other PDO databas= e not listed above. " - But does it presume that future RFCs may do so? Th= is could currently be read as "let's not do that" rather than what I think = the intent is, which is more "I'm not dealing with that here, talk about th= at later." If so, that could be clarified. Yes, I've hopefully made the words clearer. Other points answered in subsequent emails. cheers Dan Ack