Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:117985 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 51290 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2022 15:16:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 17 Jun 2022 15:16:51 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5868518054A for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 10:05:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-yw1-f169.google.com (mail-yw1-f169.google.com [209.85.128.169]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 10:05:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yw1-f169.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-31780ad7535so21984577b3.8 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 10:05:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=colopl.co.jp; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ICOZtLUXjdFLPF7T2z/ZDlB8rcptb7YjyLzLPnfvft8=; b=PzmMbLWP5q96WupPsL7u5ck7WY7ixXfHgvyxddyi3vWDil3mTKZSP3qAlhuy00tVbo YGcSnGKlAZp3Yf8Cq9btNkqgX2Seo4IQbQpUTK/+emPeu6Yc47gtbXd5mXU68CJpFfK8 ox0AT1cYrMZiwRJKyt+bZiKjmI3LKRzjdTSBYkhLpISR1ZjReEBlw4DvZcK8kWRuLwE/ vvDpHeD7kNEWiPzo3nH2EixWr7/7mZiAHXoFSNE9uZ5+s/6C2zS14jaAes81jz3DXzP0 Q91XDNCj90O991m6HK68Q/jttnyT2LoyRrKNv3gZ/bjuFWrgx712lDu7uBx2y85Jj1Vf m9Qw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=ICOZtLUXjdFLPF7T2z/ZDlB8rcptb7YjyLzLPnfvft8=; b=L4UzSOErBzt+8jBcBK8u5/Q/wMp74jIOgAXgAtIrlZVjlAr2n8PjZ+Lsi5k918xl2W y0PyYiGnWJxOAcWZVi/GzpTcnK+F98BYlEdJHOErmhvQCHpIjF1ceKiWqUnsWBnWaRvF nVpthZwPApd3o0ipK1wgSQc2VEXHj3TYyksMOH3FcsmjKOfgeLnWNEo7MbUEV7pNCVO/ 6se0kc3AZePgAPJVVE+TPLB8aVmXC/I7QBoJtBM9dZt1srU/cvXYQclSbk31q8POquvJ d2v+y7uv80HVdXSN1NT9rBRy15YAH3Kf95xYfZcSlBqnsBdDXWgfQF/ZXwNryIye+1Zc tJVQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/vshudqJUudsVaoRlKy8pqgepYCqflFyyoke5cgDi11KCleSbx nIEbJGmyv6kbEbNRr01p0d4V6xJ3IE87ZCQlxN87h4PQRDXO X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vAqYtHue346O2x9lKcNeORh4rXxNY3NsXkaar6QNvLMQkP+A5O49nSMy/cVCjXfOyDamMbLZOGp2c06/wbGgk= X-Received: by 2002:a81:3d41:0:b0:313:e95:d777 with SMTP id k62-20020a813d41000000b003130e95d777mr12676901ywa.98.1655485507111; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 10:05:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 02:04:56 +0900 Message-ID: To: Go Kudo , internals@lists.php.net, =?UTF-8?Q?Tim_D=C3=BCsterhus?= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000095251b05e1a7c1fe" Subject: Re: [RFC] [VOTE] Random Extension 5.x From: g-kudo@colopl.co.jp (Go Kudo) --00000000000095251b05e1a7c1fe Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2022=E5=B9=B46=E6=9C=8814=E6=97=A5(=E7=81=AB) 9:01 Go Kudo : > Hello internals. > > Voting began on 2022-06-14 00:00:00 (UTC) and will end on 2022-06-28 > 00:00:00 (UTC). > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/rng_extension > > The implementation is not yet complete and has some issues. > See TODO in Pull Request for details. > > https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/8094 > > Best Regards, > Go Kudo > Hi. RFC has been updated. Includes corrections to areas pointed out by Tim and changes MersenneTwister to MT19937. I also made it possible to vote for each item. https://wiki.php.net/rfc/random_extension_improvement How about it? for Tim: > I believe you missed my suggestion (4) My apologies! I had completely missed that. That new feature sounds good to me. But, I think the method name `pickString()` would be better. (It is interoperable with `pickArrayKey()`) Added to the RFC. --00000000000095251b05e1a7c1fe--