Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:117919
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <2b35605f-8da8-46b1-aec3-00bd1bfe47fd@www.fastmail.com>
 <8310f3fd-0011-970e-5379-b2b6e03942b2@gmail.com> <CADK1yXJCQiDOZbTxpv8DLycA3wZkYPEP_bOGVH0BCRxWZgX92w@mail.gmail.com>
 <886c9053-4ed6-6e40-3040-9feba6bcbe71@gmail.com> <CADK1yXK-aGpe9ymTDS1q68XLtS6ppnV_D4iS=HA0dgiAEz+UAA@mail.gmail.com>
 <041414BE-1512-4BAD-B4BB-847BE71CEDA7@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <041414BE-1512-4BAD-B4BB-847BE71CEDA7@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2022 20:09:26 +0200
Message-ID: <CADK1yXKVb2DjZOmyhBNCVZxrKHUF2zi6NFeyeZn1gYSvm21iGg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rowan Tommins <rowan.collins@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008c08b205e144140a"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Short Closures 2, aka auto-capture take 3
From: deleugyn@gmail.com (Deleu)

--0000000000008c08b205e144140a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Jun 12, 2022 at 6:55 PM Rowan Tommins <rowan.collins@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> >It seems to me that you agree that there is a chance the proposed syntax
> is
> >going to be perceived as better and people will not want to use the old
> >syntax anymore and that makes you not want to accept the RFC.
>
> No, it makes me want to make the new syntax as useful as possible.
>

On the sentiment, we can agree. It just happens that from where I'm
standing, any change to the proposed syntax will make it less useful.

--=20
Marco Aur=C3=A9lio Deleu

--0000000000008c08b205e144140a--