Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:117861
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAH19jWht_1VBgZKWL8wfb5EL6oG8JQf1zxGN2nS7dswyVB9Pzg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH19jWht_1VBgZKWL8wfb5EL6oG8JQf1zxGN2nS7dswyVB9Pzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 07:47:36 +0900
Message-ID: <CAH19jWhCnojDgXDbj+LAHnZk+ROPjmaAK2p1Q9f5TznR98bBTw@mail.gmail.com>
To: internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: Adding new closing tag =?> for keeping trailing newline
From: shinji.igarashi@gmail.com (shinji igarashi)

Hello!

I asked for opinions on reddit also.
https://www.reddit.com/r/PHP/comments/v5le6h/adding_new_closing_tag_for_kee=
ping_trailing/

Popularity on reddit and acceptance by people with voting rights on
internals can be different, but it seems that, at least in its current
form, this proposal would have a hard time winning the vote.

Until I can come up with a stronger persuasion or a nicer way of
doing this, I don't feel it has a chance to win, so I'm withdrawing
from this proposal for now and going to work on something else.

Thanks for taking a look!

--
Shinji Igarashi

2022=E5=B9=B46=E6=9C=885=E6=97=A5(=E6=97=A5) 17:23 shinji igarashi <sji@sj-=
i.dev>:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'd like to propose adding a new closing tag `=3D?>` to the language.
>
> PHP currently removes the newline character immediately following
> the closing tag `?>`.
>
> With the new closing tag `=3D?>`,  the code should look like this:
>
> ```
> - <?=3D 1 =3D?>
> - <?=3D 2 =3D?>
> - <?=3D 3 =3D?>
> ```
>
> and the results it produces would be:
>
> ```
> - 1
> - 2
> - 3
> ```
>
> instead of the following:
>
> ```
> - 1- 2- 3
> ```
>
> This addition requires only a one-line modification to the lexer and
> doesn't break BC. The proposed patch is here.
> https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/8708
>
> Before writing an RFC, I would like to hear your input on whether
> it's worth tackling.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Shinji Igarashi