Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:117404 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 40695 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2022 16:20:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 23 Mar 2022 16:20:22 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5474118053D for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 10:47:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-oa1-f50.google.com (mail-oa1-f50.google.com [209.85.160.50]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 10:47:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oa1-f50.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-d4164acd34so2443727fac.4 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 10:47:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=E03pPKZ5ezOdSCMJOj+PL6jkXQXA4nEpXr0TUK5jrJo=; b=xt6vjMa98nDGvTyZnXNfIjmqFxiNqPYR2uw8QuvaP3pAK/Q16v2T9aPhLSxW0BTOhu r6t5nNj36U4V6x0RbiEyTm7RP4LkDtJXEjtDeHBwHY+qKwM6mH3kwiQUreTYe1+z1D9/ kCr7us0TcO/Vf5txuVqSYnlFkLDoeFzvHj3+jg7DncsHELwJF50thkb+KUOmXfkjmT70 rzCHGWXP75RKa7wV5i4d+sUx3D/3P3JzuXEo0dddD3116LeqvLFr454hisJ1CDopbvbj qmb+FYlY/aCzv/y28fhiTvGfkWUyUtbRyLnytrDMpDRuZ8oZaIjkzdHv+zkl1cju4lqa 7coQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530HHyXKHQ7Or10W5Jwc9aCttN826IDgBJNkOlOv2cnnNtwNVW7w pPM4XRU2rs+XkdkY/41Ddb/WOV6iggm+dkjMzS8hnMQhX/WnRg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJznfC3+ddNGrrnLzF1ga4LOqhq/uuVKFAhwxzLukoR5EkYJQfMnqbPjcJ5tJ17y8GODh9K0/tbgCK8+oyco+KM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:248c:b0:d7:19f3:a52c with SMTP id s12-20020a056870248c00b000d719f3a52cmr498746oaq.149.1648057627842; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 10:47:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1289b56c-e766-4889-bbb2-06abb4e63a6d@www.fastmail.com> <3496914D-AF9A-48FD-B37C-DCA54CB32AFA@cschneid.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 12:46:57 -0500 Message-ID: To: Larry Garfield Cc: php internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007a2c3b05dae6518e" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Discussion: String streams From: pollita@php.net (Sara Golemon) --0000000000007a2c3b05dae6518e Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 7:21 PM Larry Garfield wrote: > Are we talking about *arbitrary* user-space operator overloading? > Because a very specific, non-arbitrary, well-designed operator > overloading RFC was just rejected. > Yup. This was pointed out to me in r11, I guess I must have missed that vote when it happened. Not even hitting 50% is as telling as it needs to be. > Personally I'd settle for a bind operator, comparison operators, > and some built-ins to use those for a new stream API bootstrap. > Yeah, streams need real love, and I hope someone with more investment in the subject takes on the work. -Sara --0000000000007a2c3b05dae6518e--