Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:117365
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.20.0.1.32\))
In-Reply-To: <CADyq6sJP9A2UaLs5v8qJutNoekUfA1eM0gCod=9zEXhxctZppA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 23:40:16 +0100
Cc: Ilija Tovilo <tovilo.ilija@gmail.com>,
 PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <4AC60E84-B2AD-43F4-9B72-92604FC7BD41@gmail.com>
References: <CAPyj-LCXYjsjtDr1zPmH6t37pQS7aeGACG6kCex=fnsEJmNmVg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADyq6sJP9A2UaLs5v8qJutNoekUfA1eM0gCod=9zEXhxctZppA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marco Pivetta <ocramius@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][Under discussion] Arbitrary string interpolation
From: tobias.nyholm@gmail.com (Tobias Nyholm)

That is a cool idea.=20
But I am not a big fan of having code in strings. Wouldn=E2=80=99t this =
open the door to all kinds of new attacks?

// Tobias

> On 17 Mar 2022, at 23:30, Marco Pivetta <ocramius@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> Hey Ilija,
>=20
> Overall not a fan: want more `sprintf()` and less interpolation, where
> possible =F0=9F=98=AC
>=20
> Couldn't we let the construct slowly decay into nothingness, perhaps?
>=20
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2022, 23:27 Ilija Tovilo, <tovilo.ilija@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>=20
>> Hi everyone
>>=20
>> I'd like to start discussion on a new RFC for arbitrary string
>> interpolation.
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/arbitrary_string_interpolation
>>=20
>> Let me know what you think.
>>=20
>> Ilija