Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:117298 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 70208 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2022 17:04:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 9 Mar 2022 17:04:12 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08AB218053B for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 10:27:30 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS24940 176.9.0.0/16 X-Spam-Virus: Error (Cannot connect to unix socket '/var/run/clamav/clamd.ctl': connect: Connection refused) X-Envelope-From: Received: from chrono.xqk7.com (chrono.xqk7.com [176.9.45.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 10:27:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bastelstu.be; s=mail20171119; t=1646850448; bh=6u81Ud9E7KcO5LteWhfHoYGUgCTPfMJot98RepdWisw=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=SqRVVadgNQfyfCoM+B7Nerpken7xbPrCTauXRGwZEZT/y++hd1E6BpdzyvQrVftev wuVbzXH+EKmQnexlL3j+9cSsPKC0vDWmWm00s29ojroft1+WHvtJr0k3VF+2X4t+X9 KVNBKKoHMguXHeHMJNvb0YoZViAyPZADJehIK+UbE0hZEIOk9IrU4TL/se6PE/za6t EZD1qRblNHI0JvTRd5fLH6OHNqlrv0KyELkI9rf/ltpKorxhEZGDSbbyFuAziKvrQ/ WXTPN8Wg0u9nQCOLSyIA6jKYzvsMgGqGUW/mBVRwuLP7hGl1Fs/bKPWw0oE04w1pxa 1AmmOax8EgXQQ== Message-ID: Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 19:27:28 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Go Kudo , internals@lists.php.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Under Discussion] Random Extension 5.x From: tim@bastelstu.be (=?UTF-8?Q?Tim_D=c3=bcsterhus?=) Hi On 3/9/22 11:48, Go Kudo wrote: > Therefore, I would like to solicit feedback on this RFC, whatever it may > be. (Just only positive or negative feedback would be okay) > I'm not sure if you missed it [1], as you didn't reply in the 4.x thread: I believe it would help the readability and clarity of the RFC if you'd add a few subsections to the "Proposal" section, as there are several distinct aspects of the RFC (e.g. the internal refactoring, the userland interface, ...) Best regards Tim Düsterhus [1] https://externals.io/message/117026#117135