Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:117129
Return-Path: <marandall@php.net>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 1066 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2022 21:43:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (76.75.200.58)
  by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 23 Feb 2022 21:43:59 -0000
To: internals@lists.php.net
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 23:03:47 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.6.1
Content-Language: en-GB
References: <620eda0f.1c69fb81.d2cb1.0846SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com>
 <5efecaef-a024-3c61-e12e-ffc342956718@gmail.com>
 <CAOWwgpkcnaVctXu8LgYpp_CLzx0QySbV87ibRqy0aD6qqHmsxA@mail.gmail.com>
 <6214c40e.1c69fb81.73261.05d3SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com>
 <CAOWwgpkoGvonQDwOS331JNWLT=zJ8pNN+CEoEce4rtebMn2+0w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADyq6sL+BxkwybsaThWbJ=wF+hYM68PepDA54BVje4FLOvyB8Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOWwgpnWE6UQ0XAYwKavR6E188NirwJ4_3BEpst2OLCjdEGB_Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <0ce34a07-3ad7-7158-d914-c18f3720ff9d@gmx.de>
 <CAOWwgpkQ0x2Mpn00PTUBVysLMwc5FcXbAVfcT_i-p7HbGF+CuQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <6216800e.1c69fb81.cbcd2.4644SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com>
 <8a5152fc-9ba5-7921-6a08-d9246ec21f57@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8a5152fc-9ba5-7921-6a08-d9246ec21f57@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Posted-By: 87.81.129.66
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Undefined Variable Error Promotion
From: marandall@php.net (Mark Randall)
Message-ID: <php.internals-117129@news.php.net>

On 23/02/2022 19:32, Rowan Tommins wrote
> I think that wording change should be part of the proposed change in the 
> RFC. Otherwise, a lot of people simply won't know the decision to remove 
> it has been made and will be surprised when 9.0 comes around.

It is already part of the RFC within the "proposed PHP versions" section.