Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:1170 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 4844 invoked from network); 2 May 2003 16:52:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO secure.thebrainroom.com) (213.239.42.171) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 2 May 2003 16:52:37 -0000 Received: from zaneeb.brainnet.i (brain.dial.nildram.co.uk [195.149.29.154]) by secure.thebrainroom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA04112; Fri, 2 May 2003 17:52:34 +0100 Received: from zaneeb.brainnet.i (IDENT:7xrWlGhaQkrdKR85emjm489PxgPkiyWs@zaneeb.brainnet.i [127.0.0.1]) by zaneeb.brainnet.i (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h42Gqa824583; Fri, 2 May 2003 17:52:36 +0100 Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 17:52:36 +0100 (BST) X-X-Sender: wez@zaneeb.brainnet.i To: Jay Smith cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <20030502153813.36640.qmail@pb1.pair.com> Message-ID: References: <20030502153813.36640.qmail@pb1.pair.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PATCH] Deprecate use of stdio From: wez@thebrainroom.com (Wez Furlong) Hi Jay, This patch solves a lot of problems within PHP itself, but it is still a good thing (tm) to link against sfio under Solaris in any case (third party libs, and some of the less popular/maintained extensions will still be using stdio). So, the patch on its own is good, the patch combined with sfio is even better. (Why can't Solaris fix their damned libc??). If you can test it under iPlanet (initially, without using sfio), the feedback would be much appreciated. --Wez. On Fri, 2 May 2003, Jay Smith wrote: > > I've been playing with sfio on Solaris quite a bit recently and I've had our > site working on iPlanet with sfio for a couple of weeks. Seems to be doing > okay so far with something between 4.3.1 and 4.3.2. Getting sfio to link > was a bit of pain in the arse at first, but it came down to a couple of > simple LIBS arguments to get it going. > > As you say, fixing the problem at the root would be preferable, but sfio > might be a decent intermediary step. > > I can test the patches and such on Solaris 8 SPARC, and if you (or anybody > who needs it, within reason of course) would like access to a Solaris > shell, I can arrange it. (It's slightly limited by a 300 MB quota, but > that's pretty much it.) > > J > > > Sascha Schumann wrote: > > > I've evaluated integrating sfio into the build process, but > > as it turns out, a full and complete integration would be a > > lot more complex than addressing the issue up-front. > > > > - Sascha