Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:116807
Return-Path: <ocramius@gmail.com>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 28763 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2022 01:25:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5)
  by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 5 Jan 2022 01:25:17 -0000
Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3818D1804A7
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue,  4 Jan 2022 18:32:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,
	SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Virus: No
X-Envelope-From: <ocramius@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ot1-f51.google.com (mail-ot1-f51.google.com [209.85.210.51])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue,  4 Jan 2022 18:32:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-f51.google.com with SMTP id v22-20020a9d4e96000000b005799790cf0bso49475112otk.5
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 18:32:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc;
        bh=gu4eZzuRbwuVTkMTQgyvSb53Crp35ho/vvQYcnvM6fE=;
        b=fiuD8KlpR9EllmiLK/PjwRrXba5t+2PGd8s3L0JDCkssZbB635ggTEF0eLhRwCg2eH
         1AvcTgXkhfIjSSRug3IPNFjsWKHjA7tob41dtq9c2g+CiZQVeiFfIOCsFKqbXGUbxln5
         lenfd4v2my8bo8WMnAVN1xlr3qJfEYh5hY6W72PVhXdrvUGV6kjZ/n4Ys+5k9Nogv5de
         bCZv9WsW10PnPxzmLUCi7dPn6AO/K3M+qP8RU8iVokfDYQkT72TG7xQU6UsTEAm6DFAJ
         g6A4XkFAqYBTPX7jPmdIewX+2zLwzfQaCtSzEhBGoX63tSY1PASZopcQm3wLQ6zsypYJ
         7aeg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=gu4eZzuRbwuVTkMTQgyvSb53Crp35ho/vvQYcnvM6fE=;
        b=KmhiW5mcP0j455a6QLFFcO5EzL3L3xHKYEwJS1WBX/9yauPuqPxOV/k3vssn5ZmeUm
         IobdbbFKq0GW80JkAA5weN7f6YyzGzW5QYjZKuDBusC0qYXH6zTRbugNq7fFvEcoCwRp
         3G0U+RMirHF1eI2jdO+K8cKgnnt78jUqzNLZE5Sqh/qeewpMLocBWTnikiGjgVeZMVPf
         Jcgo0jtFtflAreKUR7a6Nyur2WNQCNsMrh0M96HClYvKxjQ3BwCle8ELYmh4RvPvh2i+
         ae6KJXDJlRmIX+3EMcrFhJWNKoUK8iZqhRqIWX7zOOtmvZqKqSqV7n3K7IpnpzPahOYG
         cpyA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5300myeLNTOi+7fc/FAbfNlDtYjndYRjZNrbottlXZcOoaU9A1tH
	Q/HEhO2S40A0LEhc/jlYapYCn/r05P2V8q26zdM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz8Pe4rnqT4ahCE731QhEpd431Ee1KsrShS+zu3Q7RheqXNqVUVmY3yLkZceRG4r8EBBrLScl5A2UitCaGdUwI=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:1b41:: with SMTP id l59mr38448498otl.318.1641349956696;
 Tue, 04 Jan 2022 18:32:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMrTa2Emxro81j7UMA5QZ+wCOY7g46LSotLRD4oUG7HEfqSD0A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADyq6sKP6fztfF54e_VTHJRMcB8b0_TahMTTY0hw8LAgciY61w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAB-BujZB31Ccw6nhN9PG1-VDqt8YkijsYUBYPxJ-Ss1Ng4KJ+w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADyq6sLh+e74qeMrOuX1_PdN40Jw7m=3wMGMmdF-rwXkJLS1mg@mail.gmail.com>
 <3225c921-9b26-d2e0-f76f-45fff6f5a12a@processus.org> <e0358c86-622e-4347-a36c-2e8e16759004@www.fastmail.com>
 <40a1e5fa-396d-d9ef-93ab-6fcfb5054092@processus.org> <CAMrTa2FCGwkJ+kOHbyh4e=jWOBaDtb8iJiUDjqSEpA-Yts7Cpg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAB-BujZtUnesM_cWBS1T0R4=WA5MBjq6aUsXaEB5n99Pwq2wVQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMrTa2GKG_c_dCt6urpAY4S=pSWKaMBCAZCC6CCu8A2b+FdXwA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADyq6sKydDgrq+hJwrsUOsO+=Zk0sK5xnyhqz1FG3keaWy5tGg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMrTa2GAqwFLzZUBeoT=63=xWUoHBJj8uwmi8DxhZkbHwONFFA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMrTa2GAqwFLzZUBeoT=63=xWUoHBJj8uwmi8DxhZkbHwONFFA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 03:32:25 +0100
Message-ID: <CADyq6s+xj-6CQE3WscJZGt2SRfOOqAok+5441ETN8HAD1Kt4RA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jordan LeDoux <jordan.ledoux@gmail.com>
Cc: Andreas Hennings <andreas@dqxtech.net>, Pierre <pierre-php@processus.org>, 
	Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com>, php internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001f060405d4cc918e"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] User Defined Operator Overloads
From: ocramius@gmail.com (Marco Pivetta)

--0000000000001f060405d4cc918e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 3:19 AM Jordan LeDoux <jordan.ledoux@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 1:27 AM Marco Pivetta <ocramius@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Can I expect this for other math related RFCs, or is this dogmatic about
> operator overload specifically? I have no clue, and at the very least, I
> would like to learn that.
>

It's in the name: "overload"

You can certainly expect pushback from my end for any implementation
thereof.

As I mentioned above, your RFC is well implemented: I oppose the feature,
not the implementation.

Greets,

Marco Pivetta

http://twitter.com/Ocramius

http://ocramius.github.com/

--0000000000001f060405d4cc918e--