Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:116508 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 60539 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2021 10:26:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 25 Nov 2021 10:26:39 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC12E180538 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 03:23:48 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,HTML_MESSAGE, NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-pf1-f174.google.com (mail-pf1-f174.google.com [209.85.210.174]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 03:23:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-f174.google.com with SMTP id o4so5591724pfp.13 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 03:23:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wikimedia.org; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=OKP+t1UIZiMfYbSVxAmdNH8kk52rTfx1dipTapEchBk=; b=p/hCaF3mjljmeE7PZgpSlh25xyfJcwgB90br74s7r55jvwWBGnZU5vbaR00oyK/RtD FqP7SsLmykqTs6+XaoXvA57yVxufyzV3u0yE8EqpgvFNL9ZEevtRLZz/o+NflbG2QkZc 77zGseFKDXvzWeaxpJcYEvxzUVMV603iZv/uE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=OKP+t1UIZiMfYbSVxAmdNH8kk52rTfx1dipTapEchBk=; b=mR021BhanJesjOwXtypi/pCKQ4JUmr8WhgkLAr+73Bwf9NgfbvYa3gx2D16Za+S51o OR4kcIdbKu2vtR+YRxjj6igKEiSy70TBQdhe0sxBn2ERjVbWVw4hiEN00At+GCYij9g1 g3bsgsBdTCcWIJBxNgOvpQM6CLM6hiV9/2Azw+TWHE+tmM4El88lVEHDfjknTe+MKBpu a2SHKzMlSQmgpnXhDTtMX0QOUkK9x9fGDx9MphhrTaMXJlvRg+tHpI6mEJGJIJNaDZyC 8xFVwrczlhsywg6r+AbUh0n4glWeFSL4fEtCN7xj9xc1dytavY6d6VOAQHpoorAJs8N5 wEkg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531OdLeKZvIAtJ4Mq+S+6ItK50rYbTeBZGNarQ9rZ++iThWhAGN+ MC9WgyPiJ9a6MGU1TehQYjABLx+q4T281w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzd9HUkGiqdnFjIjOfu+LmDD3hPk6R3UAjg6aQI+2WvykatWAE/0GxNw7njIPL8iw8D31LCrg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:8641:: with SMTP id x62mr593403pgd.232.1637839427026; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 03:23:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.1.1.45] (124-168-155-31.dyn.iinet.net.au. [124.168.155.31]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q9sm3429669pfj.114.2021.11.25.03.23.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Nov 2021 03:23:46 -0800 (PST) To: Nicolas Grekas Cc: Internals Mailing List References: <757fcf17-4d8b-0eee-8226-e88705d92795@wikimedia.org> <59feb482-2dec-3fdc-1104-5a47cb627634@wikimedia.org> Message-ID: <12e8a42e-fbbf-5517-cd7f-5fb4b9346543@wikimedia.org> Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 22:23:43 +1100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------10EF3C84770BB1C11D18985A" Content-Language: en-US Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Locale-independent case conversion From: tstarling@wikimedia.org (Tim Starling) --------------10EF3C84770BB1C11D18985A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 25/11/21 8:58 pm, Nicolas Grekas wrote: > > The RFC says: > > because they also use isdigit() and isspace(), > > Does that mean "too much work needed"? I would totally understand > that of course but I hope someone could do these last miles. > Yes. > > and because they are intended for natural language processing > > I definitely do not agree with this argument and it should be > removed from the RFC to me as it might add confusion in the future. Done. -- Tim Starling --------------10EF3C84770BB1C11D18985A--