Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:116418
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-1371-g2296cc3491-fm-20211109.003-g2296cc34
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <ee796e3f-8f60-4d42-a724-68314d2aad82@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CANS-=pesyUO2XFf-9jxtLCbgsQN2JdHJ6z0wmc1zY3yKnQQ-Wg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAF+90c_wDsjuMFAoQLehkn5GeoLv5GByczF+o-eDmYe+VVRxTA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKuGYLQvCNjBeJToHY_x_u4QD-+n8+9iPXnX6p-caW1_nJ0HXQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEZPtU5Hmzdi-ZE+mesAY65ui1-DVnnZXDfqwsMq6482nDhmFw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANS-=pf16Eada8=YdNJmgsOiaS=NhZWErF-6qTJOmyRTHq=ZRA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEZPtU4OnOieB9OvEpGypNc=uvw-9_kV8=CXdLamCX9KnHLXmw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANS-=pesyUO2XFf-9jxtLCbgsQN2JdHJ6z0wmc1zY3yKnQQ-Wg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:35:21 -0600
To: "php internals" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Deprecate dynamic properties
From: larry@garfieldtech.com ("Larry Garfield")

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021, at 7:18 AM, Lynn wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 1:23 PM Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 4:11 PM Lynn <kjarli@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > What is the point of this change if it's an opt-in? Projects that are
>> still relying on dynamic properties today and "have no time" to fix them
>> now, won't have time in 3 years either. Please let us have nice things
>> today instead of years from now :)
>>
>> If it is an opt-in (like Larry proposes f.e.), you will have them
>> today as well.
>>
>>
> Just to be clear, are you talking about opting in to having the
> deprecation, thus adding it to every single class in my code base, and
> every new class added in the future? Or are you talking about opting in to
> enabling dynamic properties? Because the first makes it pointless to have
> while the latter makes this a great RFC.

I believe Pierre is referring to my suggestion here: https://externals.io/message/115800#116382

--Larry Garfield