Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:116357 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 50641 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2021 09:01:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 15 Nov 2021 09:01:41 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B1141804F7 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 01:56:21 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,MISSING_HEADERS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-pj1-f53.google.com (mail-pj1-f53.google.com [209.85.216.53]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 01:56:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-f53.google.com with SMTP id gx15-20020a17090b124f00b001a695f3734aso13614288pjb.0 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 01:56:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:cc; bh=TkoatwyBH2BItqiw/x2M5hejCPx/QspH0OC1hWGSQBY=; b=l8N2O9RQq1FchPZa4nKr0pbjQFdJYaIHi2ykPajCKUTiAlwz0zY5tZHn9IKLy9czih DTIA6okh/Yv8bU9egT9C/1NyDvYiPyRwWJ7BRjFoBVqG2EzFNHRX1br6S6q5FWd+3WO8 ZU35r34M/fmM0vvYiRNErK7kydjfEglfvSmst/jSUDL+UrFdXVXgWLHWeYNdvS89ytv5 TfZuKijhFN0U6S8kezJiMnqU0e+j/DzloAYJTeALlell9+cV6noTtGS6s/ELByl2CnKf MwzhddgEjN9JuxN9zQDChi9QmkOMUctJ1wLQgf1wQ3eau0Y32YYWd+m5c8yktgtKYhFE YbMQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:cc; bh=TkoatwyBH2BItqiw/x2M5hejCPx/QspH0OC1hWGSQBY=; b=kWZ3llTgN270KQyYRP0fs4r9xEn23by5UP11h34FtBtKldOw2zAhcKyaus4WK0L7td bOcPhnflIjY/1FXNBDOGWy9HQpddg2Gfzb+aG5qIsoLNeFB2edDutQL3jL8ZpvIPl29n GADSNK+RCQbPAoJzbordl+ylBkSMpb7Dq50eAvcSKP3cWliZfDqbg/UFwFeudhFQfZkH wHyYaaW2f/qhjsxidYH7Cwd0YGIBfeuzU27zWfrRdde3OQflzaIYGBfRiYm0oZqRgIM0 ms2v48rzyTt0xoF0GLPcI5yotnusDCEwmx6yYujsPm+2kat12q5uG9zk2+mhwLo9LiEa kOlw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531bhIgK+zAHzlheF+bKsVg6Z2joUD9ySUdsxsDAYaw6Gj0MXOul 5ExLAjo8L5d6v9zY6X+qjyu4LbhM4xQni+jKfR666Hkx0kjBYg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwQiKc6tukYJFMPUbPlWiWrmKuMnhMLGOVYK5khn+OaHsral8C5Pa10skqbNcb1OIEPRvxrkN7tPiNC31KM9C8= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7b82:b0:143:a6d6:34ab with SMTP id w2-20020a1709027b8200b00143a6d634abmr30231131pll.30.1636970179386; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 01:56:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 10:55:42 +0100 Message-ID: Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000ce11105d0d0d236" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Migrating to GitHub issues From: divinity76@gmail.com (Hans Henrik Bergan) --0000000000000ce11105d0d0d236 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable if hosting it ourself is a priority, i suggest looking into GitLab=E2=80=99= s Community Edition, which is entirely open source, and the GNOME project moved from Bugzilla to GitLab CE in 2018, here's how that worked out, 2 years later: https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2020/09/08/gnome-follow-up/ (and the TL;DR is that it worked out great for the GNOME project) On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 10:47, Derick Rethans wrote: > Dear Internals, > > I think it is a mistake to decide on a whim to move over to GitHub > issues without having evaluated anything else. > > GitHub is a proprietary platform, where unlike with the code > repositories, the interactions and issues are not easy to migrate out of > again. It is also now owned by MSFT, and although they are making > friendly noises towards Open Source, I remain largely skeptical (with as > a hint, the stuff they're pulling with AI code completion). > > I understand and share that "bugsnet" has many issues, and I don't > necessarily object moving to something else. > > However, in the last 25+ years we've always hosted this ourselves, and > this prevented any sort of vendor lock in. I think it is important to > own our own data here, or at least have full access to any interactions. > > This jump to GitHub Issues feels rushed, and I worry that we end up > making the wrong decision, especially because from the RFC it seems we > need to build some functionality (tags scheme, for example) on top of > it. And this will need to be maintained separately, and I worry that too > few people are going to be interested in gardening the issues on GH. > > I believe we would be much better served having a look what is > available, and see what else is suitable. I'm therefore intending to > vote no on this. > > cheers, > Derick > > > On Tue, 2 Nov 2021, Nikita Popov wrote: > > > Hi internals, > > > > The migration from bugs.php.net to GitHub issues has already been > discussed > > in https://externals.io/message/114300 and has already happened for > > documentation issues. > > > > I'd like to formally propose to use GitHub for PHP implementation issue= s > as > > well: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/github_issues > > > > Regards, > > Nikita > > > > -- > PHP 7.4 Release Manager > Host of PHP Internals News: https://phpinternals.news > Like Xdebug? Consider supporting me: https://xdebug.org/support > https://derickrethans.nl | https://xdebug.org | https://dram.io > twitter: @derickr and @xdebug > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php > > --0000000000000ce11105d0d0d236--