Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:116339 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 3904 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2021 10:31:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 13 Nov 2021 10:31:08 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5E11804C4 for ; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 03:25:19 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS29169 217.70.176.0/20 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 03:25:18 -0800 (PST) Received: (Authenticated sender: come@chilliet.eu) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B98F2E0007 for ; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 11:25:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2021 12:25:14 +0100 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: internals@lists.php.net Message-ID: <13CF3897-163D-48BD-B63E-AF94D481A1CC@chilliet.eu> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Automatic performance benchmarking: PHP 8.1 is ~30% faster than PHP 7.4 From: come@chilliet.eu (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=F4me_Chilliet?=) Le 12 novembre 2021 11:18:50 GMT+01:00, "M=C3=A1t=C3=A9 Kocsis" a =C3=A9crit : > >Furthermore, I'd have some questions regarding this project: >- Would you welcome automatic emails on internals (or on a dedicated >mailing list), just like how >Intel did it? I'm not sure about the frequency, but in my opinion, >1-2/month would be a sensible one, given there is interest in it=2E I would favor having this on a website, with an atom/rss feed=2E But I'm n= ot against having it on the ML, but more like when there is an RC or when s= ome change have significant impact=2E >- As always, I'm happy to receive feedback and improvements (ideally >along >with an implementation :) )=2E For example, currently I've started >working on >some visualization and chart support, but frontend stuff is not my area >of >expertise, so I'm progressing a bit slower than normally=2E Also, the >statistical foundations could be reviewed, and possibly improved=2E The link to the results in the readme points to https://kocsismate=2Egithu= b=2Eio/php-version-benchmarks/index=2Ehtml which is empty=2E Maybe this is = known=2E Charts=20 This quite nice! C=C3=B4me