Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:116271 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 82644 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2021 09:06:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 13 Oct 2021 09:06:03 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32DC8180381 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 02:52:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS16276 94.23.0.0/16 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from processus.org (ns366368.ip-94-23-14.eu [94.23.14.201]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 02:52:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from authenticated-user (PRIMARY_HOSTNAME [PUBLIC_IP]) by processus.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9036D5101324; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 09:52:26 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 11:52:25 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Guilliam Xavier , Rowan Tommins Cc: internals@lists.php.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Authentication-Results: processus.org; auth=pass smtp.auth=pierre-php@processus.org smtp.mailfrom=pierre-php@processus.org X-Spamd-Bar: / Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] Deprecate dynamic properties From: pierre-php@processus.org (Pierre) Le 13/10/2021 à 11:17, Guilliam Xavier a écrit : > Off-topic: > > if ( class_exists('\\WeakMap') ) { > People should stop using a leading slash in FQCN *strings*. \Foo::class is > "Foo", not "\Foo". It might work generally but that's asking for problems > (e.g. for autoloaders). > > (Sorry.) > And why not ? using the FQDN is 100% valid, autoloaders should take care of this, not the end user. For what it worth, I'm using both, depending upon context, both can make sense. Regards, -- Pierre