Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:116101 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 27709 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2021 07:55:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 20 Sep 2021 07:55:38 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD3F1804B2 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 01:36:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS16276 94.23.0.0/16 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from processus.org (ns366368.ip-94-23-14.eu [94.23.14.201]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 01:36:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from authenticated-user (PRIMARY_HOSTNAME [PUBLIC_IP]) by processus.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EA7275101324; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 08:36:10 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <2cc07ebd-81b0-6083-3b3d-2a678ba39784@processus.org> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 10:36:09 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en-US To: tyson andre , "internals@lists.php.net" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Authentication-Results: processus.org; auth=pass smtp.auth=pierre-php@processus.org smtp.mailfrom=pierre-php@processus.org X-Spamd-Bar: / Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Adding `final class Deque` to PHP From: pierre-php@processus.org (Pierre) Le 20/09/2021 à 02:03, tyson andre a écrit : > Hi internals, > > I've created a new RFC https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deque to add a `final class Deque` Hello, It seems that you are writing more than one RFC to add many data structures. I love that you're doing that, but I suggest that you'd normalize them all and place all new classes in a single new dedicated namespace. Regards, -- Pierre