Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:115928 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 19390 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2021 13:26:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 3 Sep 2021 13:26:39 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07DAD1804C9 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 07:03:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-ed1-f49.google.com (mail-ed1-f49.google.com [209.85.208.49]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 07:03:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-f49.google.com with SMTP id g22so8108515edy.12 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 07:03:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=77LpjUs1EI6Y4g3E6mDp5PVidgyeoi8bnoWWNuC1n68=; b=IkyffUW5N9SOGl48AqbYb1fiEw2cInJHeqmK8nwL0PDeSrlDcqkMJNnLSGyZml/ewE 2I5Wnj80/qhp4txSfOAsfistEHn6jp9RwJmWKhU2SELSAF9Rp9oVof2fDlHxrtyTUvEy VYwLJkkngXZx/leOhmmKeYqY59zupo88nBzn8tNynLd6FEOy+An3hH+isbuepVO9MdRe KVCqfdEJwh5+w0Eqe51VlrnTWQb8w8hCmxFQQWTxZ+C1GGjglFQAIMbHIMm74xVWbKWA 2JNbZa9BjpaUjWxThnzgdJvdRpEjCXKMzAPhT3ZxsdjqltVhmWs+gSyxNXHiMTzAdD2y ddsA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=77LpjUs1EI6Y4g3E6mDp5PVidgyeoi8bnoWWNuC1n68=; b=cHixyeuETlxmbeACeKRzJkDBCcEiRY3knh/1sARh413TypAnbMNq3w3gUaH7a2tH48 mQieGfTmtMis/uEoCHSDurCeh4OhVHfPkZr+lPTUSmK+g8ffESXMluUUcMlXF97EH5yJ +TmCUSbDob8ha6jvK4L9dYFsoeW6Scd1JhQZKWqKJHkLzjlRRgg7p6M13BgQ3pMnXh6v 4S62dxFIN+DdxkUFSqjM8+DxenWw5TyOE0D6h2R3cOgh2Q4OQDsYNSNkz2XEM7CuwK95 YNR3MR8/IL8uEznPk+3G/cj7EFsUrIWQnufsZn0yEDZvznbP+L2ZGsF6twh+oqyFp4H5 Ov6g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ESBjNbcTa6x7HtpRyCaPJE8yTGoh9yAISxyiGPmMMUakR5A9D ElzglnLrkk+KDB5f0yRCShkvzqprb1HAixNVodV13rXqnMewkw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyABxKehqah8bBqpYrIG0oAjmlY5qWCppg4Q6QZUk/ToUbXicjg2pqm6vJx+PQbaMfZQPACv/OSFQEX3wD90CE= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:cd92:: with SMTP id x18mr4122269edv.325.1630677787430; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 07:03:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6921b613-d993-4e5b-82a7-60e3c9b3df38@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6921b613-d993-4e5b-82a7-60e3c9b3df38@www.fastmail.com> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 23:02:56 +0900 Message-ID: To: Larry Garfield , PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004352c105cb17c23b" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Random Extension 3.0 From: zeriyoshi@gmail.com (Go Kudo) --0000000000004352c105cb17c23b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable My apologies. I had skipped one. > And either way it needs more clarity about how you'd write one for reals. Added a simple example comparing it to mt_rand. What do you think of this? 2021=E5=B9=B49=E6=9C=883=E6=97=A5(=E9=87=91) 3:26 Larry Garfield : > On Thu, Sep 2, 2021, at 10:10 AM, Go Kudo wrote: > > Hi Internals. > > > > Expanded from the previous RFC and changed it to an RFC that organizes > the > > whole PHP random number generator. Also, the target version has been > > changed to 8.2. > > > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/rng_extension > > https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/7453 > > > > Hopefully you will get some good responses. > > > > Regards, > > Go Kudo > > This looks pretty nice to my unskilled eye. Two questions. > > 1) Why is the number generator a parent class rather than an interface? > It seems like an interface target. And either way it needs more clarity > about how you'd write one for reals. (It returns an int, so does that me= an > getBytes() just derives from a series of ints?) > > 2) You don't mention the CSPRNG functions at all. Is there any intention > to fold those into this model as well, or to leave those as is? Or is th= e > Secure generator implementation intended to replace those? It's unclear > here. > > --Larry Garfield > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php > > --0000000000004352c105cb17c23b--