Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:115865 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 47228 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2021 19:12:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 26 Aug 2021 19:12:16 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4240A1804AD for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 12:46:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS3301 81.224.0.0/12 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from ts201-smtpout75.ddc.teliasonera.net (ts201-smtpout75.ddc.teliasonera.net [81.236.60.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 12:46:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telia.com; s=tssemail; t=1630007206; bh=4kYNrPB8/V+v3LXnDVWER1Hq39r/F/OVzUKODQNYAoM=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To; b=ZhbETpGusEzS9esHq1IbV3FOBVE4zKYNKjh1mBGq6FZQexeLlne8LeQeMeY4Gla7UNbyVa2XcziDxZVpjj/7rZpIfFrOrXZZtrH1J7P5543cDz0SV2LTM2SP6IYd12lXRcKLwwr537O6r5rc4X51U1/osoE1BiHPcz37StZ8ac3fu33PWb4gpNID/ywG3TCdyw52I/S/iTDIm3vDxYkolpL2iyPakY4jmYrNG7UMcByfJilSODKaMMt0UonwAtu2b6I1Ccl2n1MsBf6gPT8qrXvQ8jsuRnYm/7reaG0pPH0ZMEd08KrHzm6Chmvs8KpO5G7zwzgKFdHkdEv8BqZz1Q== X-RG-Rigid: 60C4728C03E9A134 X-Originating-IP: [213.64.245.126] X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrudduuddgudegtdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfvgffnkfetufghpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfqfgfvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenogfuuhhsphgvtghtffhomhgrihhnucdlgeelmdenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtkeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpeeujhpnrhhnpgfnrghrshhsohhnuceosghjohhrnhdrgidrlhgrrhhsshhonhesthgvlhhirgdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepleehgfdtkefgudeufeeivdelhfeuveefgedvieehfeegjeehleeuheefteffueeknecuffhomhgrihhnpeefvheglhdrohhrghenucfkphepvddufedrieegrddvgeehrdduvdeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehhvghloheplgduledvrdduieekrdejrdduudgnpdhinhgvthepvddufedrieegrddvgeehrdduvdeipdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepuhekleeltdeigedujeesphhnvgdrthgvlhhirgdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehinhhtvghrnhgrlhhssehlihhsthhsrdhphhhprdhnvghtpdhrtghpthhtoheprhgrmhhsvgihsehphhhprdhnvght X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean Received: from [192.168.7.11] (213.64.245.126) by ts201-smtpout75.ddc.teliasonera.net (5.8.716) (authenticated as u89906417) id 60C4728C03E9A134; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 21:46:43 +0200 To: Ben Ramsey , php internals References: <775dc98a-b3c5-d498-71f7-9f19ff891f29@telia.com> Reply-To: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=c3=b6rn_Larsson?= Message-ID: Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 21:46:43 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: 8.1 / Exception / Property Type / Backwardscompatbility From: internals@lists.php.net ("Björn Larsson via internals") Den 2021-08-26 kl. 20:34, skrev Ben Ramsey: > Nikita Popov wrote on 8/26/21 09:57: >> Right. I at least do not plan to address this issue. If you take a >> protected property and publicly re-export it, then any compatibility issues >> are on you. > > This does not appear to affect only cases where one is re-exporting a > protected property as public. > > Exception protected properties without type hints: > > * PHP <= 8.0 - https://3v4l.org/GWmrk > * PHP 8.1 - https://3v4l.org/GWmrk/rfc > > > Exception protected properties with type hints: > > * PHP <= 8.0 - https://3v4l.org/UX1Pa > * PHP 8.1 - https://3v4l.org/UX1Pa/rfc > > Cheers, > Ben > So it looks like we have a bug here since the same code behaves differently between 8.0 and 8.1. I don't think it's obvoius that by adding a type hint we get different behaviour for the "same" code in 8.0 vs 8.1. The reason I brought this up is that in an Open source library it's discussed how to solve this. Loading different versions of the libray feels clunky. r//Björn L