Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:115855 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 14950 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2021 13:45:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 26 Aug 2021 13:45:39 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA80180504 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 07:20:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS8560 212.227.0.0/16 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 07:20:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1629987601; bh=uTeyfOsTtQo48EnVR7ce+uDT6SnGA45F8aSOcHvD18g=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=VMGi1bL1BiMBFYAWD7GZ0t5SoVZcDpirxnYjMTR9GAFBcFeHXdCvAFD6bdLSqjZtY +nsk4hZPEyN+p1M5iv/ppFE0Rq8XUpqGmS9/KC75P/KleCOJke5+TLp88t3PjOxF4G vaV7wt7XWiJcKLMn5U2VUfeL2MgeJzELvv3JuXJw= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [192.168.2.130] ([79.222.39.90]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MmlT2-1mhq9n16u6-00joB2; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 16:20:01 +0200 To: =?UTF-8?Q?Olle_H=c3=a4rstedt?= , PHP internals References: Message-ID: Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 16:20:00 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: de-DE Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:LczceOuB/p6kKfapN88lbFIEHlfCJXM0wY4LwHO18AB1FiV66AM QjMcdRSIvpIY9D6XVI2Zskc2WwFniGaDFldOniPripFg92eQkpM4cz6ts+wZVCvb5vIGWj1 K7TPuX7+HU2COdYrUfY8DfXso5y6gyYJlDxvaNkZd+9Kaso55k3/8bcmY2Kl18wEQ5ayLWu p5b0n8Z+TAgAQ/kFiD7ZQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:Npufln0u08c=:IKDiB0qvO28KvVy163vXv/ JgR3Zioo22wfa86GRouej1BFbGjgOsUGTjp5j2XOm2xVEtTMXAGTAyFVJb5vh+fEv8JfvtQUd cSeV+InYMeMxjm2abdP5LViuODOxxifqicIC2wblAEFpspthStaC78S2s7CGwRN69J3b8A9Pl nUnomqOaoTpOVOcXJDOQNK44ZgIuMTs4xm6ZYaO6uvHLQUcvAFc1r3vrsS8kD692eIKlUe+r0 RdjQrxz//J4Vi65WX53hAykyTRLdVZWMVdhXYY8qsAOR12fLMTfnILny0OGoS2ssfxdglK1sO EAUjLpWVMlPHtHfCFwWxeXM4wfvuuxkQxZ9Hels4CskLKy8Sn4lxMO9fLt1cwG84BU7mqUm0N uFV9QnQ8425ta8qOY0YeT1lraz/t0I6drpMweRSxVMfiBScN4J6u2JHf+RDwQ/G5YYqp839PL WLkkPe0wq7L5+NC/Ok/DTjgSwQexykifADLjp158NOtqzhWreHLOGSf4sIjEh0VKvRTJW5Ije xpH8aJFXcFKdf1w2fGf6kIIPUmzZrrzGq8SQYdBfurJbDnPZNSBmEv/7QLqDnn7P436QtmFRu IjNAWyDEGYThucODY7pV6oPT7n3J0kDxHy1moBXAU0IsFKz8y6wfVf9BJYgO/D2WAsRAmEIc9 T9N++11/U7nnQlFL7OrQwDFsw1yYCL2aaxEpGRlEBk9PWdm3DNRtO+rVSgwybHXObN1BA+E5n P9NTMQGswpXsiAx7RAIlzkt0ub1wNRa0pci1yNlbcwdZ9H/UagGi1DrJvGZ/yZc7/KVmpr/Hf 7n/swMmqbf6nTfRG4gCePI0qupgEiEmTx1ISZlaWNYGrLSgnWO1RHTJhyTRQyEdlS2upCO4tc mOIbfV2VEhtJpki4W31nzTI0yBJF+lUj6hqtttvfBgC2eBL8CXecZasp8qChtleWz044bhvb9 QIYw244x+Bf6e9hV0yRlix3j4rYkK5yvTcRxtbNiVpfUtG/NkQp332Z6kaRKBmxZWT8kqkgPC knXxW3hUDKsfibvubFMgpw9CvjT9dMzHEvG7x43nwLCv0f0KUUMvmV36mibYAM3+FqTQR9mzY 4qakVwgRBpRIGE3ZgcgNs77cxN+rch6YYsJgoG5mQtNE3ShVnmW+sMKsw== Subject: Re: Alternatives for encapsulation when using composition instead of inheritance From: cmbecker69@gmx.de ("Christoph M. Becker") On 26.08.2021 at 15:47, Olle H=C3=A4rstedt wrote: > * Friend classes, like in C++: Class B is annotated to be a friend of > A, so class A can see the content of class B but no other class can. has been declined. > * Namespace private: Class A and B are defined in the same namespace, > so they can see each other's properties that are defined as "internal" appears to be inactive. =2D- Christoph M. Becker