Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:115508
Return-Path: <andreas@heigl.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 77552 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2021 05:57:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5)
  by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 20 Jul 2021 05:57:46 -0000
Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 210381804D1
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 23:22:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,
	SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Virus: No
X-Envelope-From: <andreas@heigl.org>
Received: from mail.stella-maris.solutions (mail.stella-maris.solutions [46.101.232.159])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 23:22:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.1.151] (heigl.gw.tgnet.de [80.72.250.242])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.stella-maris.solutions (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF272810D0
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 06:22:54 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=heigl.org; s=mail;
	t=1626762174; bh=zMhdIeahla07HUi6ptrGIH+kUcLUosyhfeRp7RQD57U=;
	h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From;
	b=jiGe9KRQBnszdWug6y0XjbvKxn4bcxrIahaGb610O4YAN6Ddgiobbb1qnlOiOQVod
	 N8AgQDbbse/j+7HZYkBO85BuerUg1BejfD4pq+YZhqvXAAAq9t0um7iNIZeW6lKxaS
	 FfZUXwXg4XXTUF21V6eB1KdBh3TIRvvefkiEL6YtWJDXXw+YYqAuXifp1yOjGVX4Jb
	 DkBVcCbTqPFbNfPIpzTE7Qwro2iEOgdnCVNO5saAz6keSS4xQaIJWwcRddFm+8rxk/
	 FpzsTYR0+1vGwYEwYA7xNODlwWbmwf7E+IJqT6DooT/KyI3icdYqIV2v8jFZBY/wey
	 eIUdKjXJq1Rhw==
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <96487D08-8573-4308-A11C-3118113C03DA@gmail.com>
 <CAF+90c_Bm5J7-CxpidME89iMATqryRH2Mc0mTog_KAUJccuw5w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAKU0ukYZUU5UO1VPsdbrjN16JnKp563aecrx3_O+n-eQmzDjg@mail.gmail.com>
 <9d55f768-41d2-d970-8417-aa786d86b984@heigl.org>
Message-ID: <b550a7ec-901a-ab9b-59f8-14afefa91c21@heigl.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 08:22:45 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9d55f768-41d2-d970-8417-aa786d86b984@heigl.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="8zJ3T7cHBx5LXaMrwKD4qal0ux0vli5GV"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Request for karma to vote on RFCs
From: andreas@heigl.org (Andreas Heigl)

--8zJ3T7cHBx5LXaMrwKD4qal0ux0vli5GV
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="lP33ItGRDEvdIM29sbn7GLrFSpMZxLDgK";
 protected-headers="v1"
From: Andreas Heigl <andreas@heigl.org>
To: internals@lists.php.net
Message-ID: <b550a7ec-901a-ab9b-59f8-14afefa91c21@heigl.org>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Request for karma to vote on RFCs
References: <96487D08-8573-4308-A11C-3118113C03DA@gmail.com>
 <CAF+90c_Bm5J7-CxpidME89iMATqryRH2Mc0mTog_KAUJccuw5w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAKU0ukYZUU5UO1VPsdbrjN16JnKp563aecrx3_O+n-eQmzDjg@mail.gmail.com>
 <9d55f768-41d2-d970-8417-aa786d86b984@heigl.org>
In-Reply-To: <9d55f768-41d2-d970-8417-aa786d86b984@heigl.org>

--lP33ItGRDEvdIM29sbn7GLrFSpMZxLDgK
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hey All

Am 19.07.21 um 17:02 schrieb Andreas Heigl:
> Hey All
>=20
> Am 19.07.21 um 16:34 schrieb Levi Morrison via internals:
>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 2:38 AM Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com> wr=
ote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 8:48 PM Tobias Nyholm <tobias.nyholm@gmail.co=
m>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey.
>>>> I would like to get karma to be able to vote on RFCs. I understand t=
hat
>>>> voting karma isn=E2=80=99t usually given out to people who write the=
ir first
>>>> mailing list entry.
>>>>
>>>> But I do believe I qualify as =E2=80=9CLead developers of PHP based =
projects
>>>> (frameworks, cms, tools, etc.)=E2=80=9D
>>>
>>> Hey Tobias,
>>>
>>> My response here is basically the same as the last time the topic cam=
e up:
>>> https://externals.io/message/110936#110937 Voting is just the very la=
st
>>> step of the RFC process, at which point the proposal can no longer be=

>>> influenced. If you have feedback about a proposal based on your exten=
sive
>>> experience in PHP's open source ecosystem, then the discussion phase =
is the
>>> time to provide it, while it can still influence the proposal, as wel=
l as
>>> other people's view of the proposal.
>>
>> I second this.
>>
>>> At least in my personal opinion, I think it's important that people g=
ranted
>>> voting rights as community representatives have at least some histori=
cal
>>> involvement in RFC discussions.
>>
>> I agree with this, but have no specific objection to granting Tobias
>> voting karma, as this is underspecified; how long should they
>> participate? What kinds of involvement are appropriate? Being
>> underspecified is not really their fault, and I don't feel like it
>> would be an abuse to grant them voting karma, but do think it would be=

>> an abuse to deny them voting karma indefinitely because "we" don't get=

>> around to specifying it. It should be less of a decision on a
>> case-by-case basis and more of a checklist.
>>
>=20
> Sounds like we need an RFC to make it clearer how voting karma for the
> RFC process will be granted in the future.

I have created a draft for an RFC to implement future rules for granting
voting karma.

If you want to contribute to that, feel free to open a PR against it[1].

To be able to make the future karma grants more trnasparent this needs
input from everyone: Opponoents as well as proponents!

I'm looking forward to a fruitful conversation and to a great RFC that
can move us to more transparency.

Cheers

Andreas

[1]
https://github.com/heiglandreas/rfc/blob/main/implement_future_rules_for_=
granting_voting_karma.md

--=20
                                                              ,,,
                                                             (o o)
+---------------------------------------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo-+
| Andreas Heigl                                                       |
| mailto:andreas@heigl.org                  N 50=C2=B022'59.5" E 08=C2=B0=
23'58" |
| https://andreas.heigl.org                                           |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| https://hei.gl/appointmentwithandreas                               |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+


--lP33ItGRDEvdIM29sbn7GLrFSpMZxLDgK--

--8zJ3T7cHBx5LXaMrwKD4qal0ux0vli5GV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=COiu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--8zJ3T7cHBx5LXaMrwKD4qal0ux0vli5GV--