Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:115508 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 77552 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2021 05:57:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 20 Jul 2021 05:57:46 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 210381804D1 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 23:22:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail.stella-maris.solutions (mail.stella-maris.solutions [46.101.232.159]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 23:22:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.16.1.151] (heigl.gw.tgnet.de [80.72.250.242]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.stella-maris.solutions (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF272810D0 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 06:22:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=heigl.org; s=mail; t=1626762174; bh=zMhdIeahla07HUi6ptrGIH+kUcLUosyhfeRp7RQD57U=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=jiGe9KRQBnszdWug6y0XjbvKxn4bcxrIahaGb610O4YAN6Ddgiobbb1qnlOiOQVod N8AgQDbbse/j+7HZYkBO85BuerUg1BejfD4pq+YZhqvXAAAq9t0um7iNIZeW6lKxaS FfZUXwXg4XXTUF21V6eB1KdBh3TIRvvefkiEL6YtWJDXXw+YYqAuXifp1yOjGVX4Jb DkBVcCbTqPFbNfPIpzTE7Qwro2iEOgdnCVNO5saAz6keSS4xQaIJWwcRddFm+8rxk/ FpzsTYR0+1vGwYEwYA7xNODlwWbmwf7E+IJqT6DooT/KyI3icdYqIV2v8jFZBY/wey eIUdKjXJq1Rhw== To: internals@lists.php.net References: <96487D08-8573-4308-A11C-3118113C03DA@gmail.com> <9d55f768-41d2-d970-8417-aa786d86b984@heigl.org> Message-ID: Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 08:22:45 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9d55f768-41d2-d970-8417-aa786d86b984@heigl.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8zJ3T7cHBx5LXaMrwKD4qal0ux0vli5GV" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Request for karma to vote on RFCs From: andreas@heigl.org (Andreas Heigl) --8zJ3T7cHBx5LXaMrwKD4qal0ux0vli5GV Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="lP33ItGRDEvdIM29sbn7GLrFSpMZxLDgK"; protected-headers="v1" From: Andreas Heigl To: internals@lists.php.net Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Request for karma to vote on RFCs References: <96487D08-8573-4308-A11C-3118113C03DA@gmail.com> <9d55f768-41d2-d970-8417-aa786d86b984@heigl.org> In-Reply-To: <9d55f768-41d2-d970-8417-aa786d86b984@heigl.org> --lP33ItGRDEvdIM29sbn7GLrFSpMZxLDgK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey All Am 19.07.21 um 17:02 schrieb Andreas Heigl: > Hey All >=20 > Am 19.07.21 um 16:34 schrieb Levi Morrison via internals: >> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 2:38 AM Nikita Popov wr= ote: >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 8:48 PM Tobias Nyholm >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hey. >>>> I would like to get karma to be able to vote on RFCs. I understand t= hat >>>> voting karma isn=E2=80=99t usually given out to people who write the= ir first >>>> mailing list entry. >>>> >>>> But I do believe I qualify as =E2=80=9CLead developers of PHP based = projects >>>> (frameworks, cms, tools, etc.)=E2=80=9D >>> >>> Hey Tobias, >>> >>> My response here is basically the same as the last time the topic cam= e up: >>> https://externals.io/message/110936#110937 Voting is just the very la= st >>> step of the RFC process, at which point the proposal can no longer be= >>> influenced. If you have feedback about a proposal based on your exten= sive >>> experience in PHP's open source ecosystem, then the discussion phase = is the >>> time to provide it, while it can still influence the proposal, as wel= l as >>> other people's view of the proposal. >> >> I second this. >> >>> At least in my personal opinion, I think it's important that people g= ranted >>> voting rights as community representatives have at least some histori= cal >>> involvement in RFC discussions. >> >> I agree with this, but have no specific objection to granting Tobias >> voting karma, as this is underspecified; how long should they >> participate? What kinds of involvement are appropriate? Being >> underspecified is not really their fault, and I don't feel like it >> would be an abuse to grant them voting karma, but do think it would be= >> an abuse to deny them voting karma indefinitely because "we" don't get= >> around to specifying it. It should be less of a decision on a >> case-by-case basis and more of a checklist. >> >=20 > Sounds like we need an RFC to make it clearer how voting karma for the > RFC process will be granted in the future. I have created a draft for an RFC to implement future rules for granting voting karma. If you want to contribute to that, feel free to open a PR against it[1]. To be able to make the future karma grants more trnasparent this needs input from everyone: Opponoents as well as proponents! I'm looking forward to a fruitful conversation and to a great RFC that can move us to more transparency. Cheers Andreas [1] https://github.com/heiglandreas/rfc/blob/main/implement_future_rules_for_= granting_voting_karma.md --=20 ,,, (o o) +---------------------------------------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo-+ | Andreas Heigl | | mailto:andreas@heigl.org N 50=C2=B022'59.5" E 08=C2=B0= 23'58" | | https://andreas.heigl.org | +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ | https://hei.gl/appointmentwithandreas | +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ --lP33ItGRDEvdIM29sbn7GLrFSpMZxLDgK-- --8zJ3T7cHBx5LXaMrwKD4qal0ux0vli5GV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEOHo7et0VdZk8RJK34Ff+SCK3tkUFAmD2a7UACgkQ4Ff+SCK3 tkVylhAAsHPIC3uDndkqpP9QcwvzPcViQV+vX6WF4Y1b8+A8/XrvDHsvyyZTcX+b Vc1TFdnJXkIFuQAB34AgDCo/HK7qCu7Bm9Rp0TnfwYH7kKLbcVsyy3A2qJlQSf8t OpHTrBfXgRkif8qaXdbk6Q9fs9Qe77mKzaeywNhLTuCGpX+OysWIMFdFmAGybfPc /dHS7aUByLU2ieleg5iYdDaGFe8y5SLXRbuAxKN56hdtsIIBipmE4htokhCw4HSx EHpEeIca1/bQ2SG/GyPsQ95fnRR1zaE9KqPyn337X/k1C8Jl4dETIcvTSTywtoXB TajSeIURfzWQueb4sG23+TynG6QDE6fkcQmC5m84PnXwoptXAOLjMg7xDIOiJH8p IavdnD4PFL7e2U9aUOAHDYYrgbn9/wQhMmtXjhnC7S2FyqsfgBFlThKjYfW7TlOv 0umRh3t4yolPah+30yoTF8khUOQsKWvgL3KTbbohM1UG4OQ2g0fr7iWIrA7r/0be BOKEByARA5NfvPJmXpFD1RLGB0kHotKMVzR5qIzcAJ7kfGEZdo34D9PxdpC8l1GX 3bW8hmDFDG+tc/CGKkSyF3Odcb0GJxUM/9qAEDBzfgKkFZTDT43MJiIrWp5Ywd3+ iayILdD+5moK+/klgzuWIuIl9nJROHhG9Uru5XVMJWTPqL7oGzY= =COiu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8zJ3T7cHBx5LXaMrwKD4qal0ux0vli5GV--