Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:115400 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 226 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2021 11:08:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 12 Jul 2021 11:08:49 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D6618033A for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 04:31:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 04:31:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1626089516; bh=DMo/ghDe9Y6tR+3+hFtRSYFyFJ4rmlkQR22wnMNZ0oc=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=kQnZOPUUTevDEtG3twEg11MsJzwM8xWFVSCq9dRX9CPW1ZQOxNFLdI7NtyhyxK82n d8ZwV53xyWVNVV/cxD/onPQ4oeUeVc2WXwoY/dcLmxEzaMgFDlBwBa/QzZ7u7mI5AW n8FEwygZOvrfyqgdrLkpc0DeVDmc+MgFMYGK1I0Y= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [192.168.2.130] ([79.222.35.151]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M2f5T-1m0Qeh2G3b-0049q3; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 13:31:56 +0200 To: Pierre Joye , PHP internals References: Message-ID: <2f940029-7518-396a-b3f1-030348766d83@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 13:31:56 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: de-DE Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:fRFC3RBPJhwnC5rxtG+XGMsZxVDHEVpOqZIM6tVDzGHDc5+UTSv AFW/zsYFL6lAN55ggYaHBSOqWJlDhukrDpk0BU7spb0r7qzHO86GZWDjaWRfNTpohnQWX7c CouG9C0IdocF+jeZlKzHlwKaS0bBnLccYNBSovQTjU4cDcEyEpWgjg5/0vsC32Io8+PJIom 3M7EshNBJa5RRmj40pkOQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:11QY3Wy1ipc=:jByXGxL15EDixb+DzHL145 g7Euvj9Fe/p8m2V0Dinw+blrQ+OTOCs15/oOmEHm8BjX6AQsK0z/01EhhIoxIHQol/xFeTqbe +eTlYRQ27xV5UOzHA4T1KNh5MEFfXMUJQyyr+FLfnaWN8NztDZMpSqNh1k4dElhI+FaoRBHC8 s5uoNP98thVZKjDsnG4a3PWjHeZJGHRTkOqaEbmJdPP/2fBFK/V86yfGOO54rfwSuFwMdT7PW D4JgLmGSjvFQJKACCb+H11Z7Jt3r506MPgVIm41VhlE3onCk4UC3skW2tVJbOfyqZWP5rRyOK opnM26maMqI0DOKlzTvyzqrG+06NEy/eQrZHU5VuN/he1nZ4uzYZFqFtW1JK2hQQUwh/kSTai EGeQxV4g9Xd7biyH/VsM9PNGA+Tj43Sv+5GGiFa317gkCwiIXxqXq0dwicXqdfdXLxFLbw++y u5dNUkmCUQzwPUhdS5LWgjUeRozXpf2zkUsZLPIekgzG7E/x+y8E3p2ZubL+3TyPEyL2BE0i3 VhbRtVO2cEyqmwTnfpPGD/hBpAqNwBchjElRsK9f5tFl7piZ1xqfJCh1yCOSOzu309bf3Jzlp hGjKOHFNYyJRSFmFJU9LixSkdtMhgq7J7sJl9jH9B62M7MDC1M/d5d+OWqmloM78nzRd/cypz AgQyQ8/mHgigDTVaEh6tj4UJXG1OAClpryPc5KU1SUdXAU16eGBmr+9nyuJ7Qiz7TyB9knlCq 5l9qIMxoYe79hf3ZNC0Z5zUfkH0QErPlKkeP3g0rBXn9kLTKr9U94ptTn6rPP72kVmqt+bVt2 Q+awaMNQXw9YrHOjkoXiZL4anR4uBZf8CpZQZ1OKXGyru8v+zM6y+YfktATgv+7QTIqd5Hplu dxFvL3r5qSZ4TNmp9tIjQ5QMVhr4vFTUwZsxHXuuE4aaWsMJZU0Z4BR4VRppK9bF7xUtZvae0 ss12z7YAlbcvtC7fekzp6g89Pvp1MEJJK4YQU1TmFZL0xbiE9yrXPrSYCLE6NANYvXzU4RRSM 78oSpwnRYnDUl08VI7V7tU37JXnj6imqpL1vpgk0RwMFO7OeauNer/Non3+sbElpGzzqYfBeu VtaSAup5QZDCH19Id1xho7gA7PRKyk05VgB Subject: Re: Bundled Extension namespace(s) From: cmbecker69@gmx.de ("Christoph M. Becker") On 12.07.2021 at 11:10, Pierre Joye wrote: > What is the status of the extension namespace RFC > (https://wiki.php.net/rfc/namespaces_in_bundled_extensions)? > > In the near future, I plan to work a bit on the ext/gd one. Adding > quite a few things I have in my queue for too long. Check > https://github.com/libgd/libgd/issues/705 if interested. > > I am not sure about the base NS to be used. if I follow the RFC, it > should be Image\. The RFC states: | The top-level namespace should match the extension name (apart from | casing). So shouldn't the namespace rather be Gd or GD? Christoph