Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:115343
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABTDVhD9SKNVFrt8NMj4BqdHmsMpSt0DH=SMmb-9C905rgc7PA@mail.gmail.com>
 <c4d01e7b-0b23-042a-cbe4-623e86dc8a81@php.net> <CABTDVhDOaDj46BG4TxctQAUL8=Bc8FADWU5RaTmSWgMRFAkhkA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAF+90c8MabpFieUCsShp=rB1XwCdKBfGfpAyCfszEXyq=06PwQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF+90c8MabpFieUCsShp=rB1XwCdKBfGfpAyCfszEXyq=06PwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 21:01:55 +0900
Message-ID: <CABTDVhACLtGpG2vvy5NgNTBwavFKM6g34ap+BgNpHdDY0pmHRQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>, 
	Remi Collet <remi@php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ac65e105c6874e0b"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Add Random Extension (before: Add Random class)
From: zeriyoshi@gmail.com (Go Kudo)

--000000000000ac65e105c6874e0b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> We can rename the ext/standard header.

OK. I'll rename random in ext/standard. This will not be BC break maybe.

2021=E5=B9=B47=E6=9C=887=E6=97=A5(=E6=B0=B4) 19:32 Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv=
@gmail.com>:

> On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 4:38 PM Go Kudo <zeriyoshi@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> > 1st
>>
>> This is to avoid conflicts with the implementation in ext/standard. I
>> don't
>> want to do it this way either, but I have to do it this way.
>> Since random in ext/standard does not use namespaces, I would like to
>> change the ext/standard side.
>>
>
> To clarify, are you referring to the php_random.h header in ext/standard?
> I agree with Remi that the extension should be in ext/random, not
> ext/random_ext. We can rename the ext/standard header.
>
> Alternatively, you could also use ext/rng, with names RNG\Random,
> RNG\NumberGenerator\XorShift128Plus etc.
>
> Regards,
> Nikita
>
>
>> > 2nd
>>
>> Although it goes back quite a long time, this implementation was
>> originally
>> based on an extension I submitted to PECL.
>>
>> https://pecl.php.net/package/orng
>>
>> After I posted this to PECL, I found that an object scope RNG had been
>> proposed in the past in the Internals ML, and there was positive feedbac=
k
>> about it.
>>
>> https://externals.io/message/112525
>>
>> However, the proposal never actually took place. This RFC is a realizati=
on
>> of that proposal.
>>
>> Is that what you asked?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Go Kudo
>>
>> 2021=E5=B9=B47=E6=9C=886=E6=97=A5(=E7=81=AB) 22:46 Remi Collet <remi@php=
.net>:
>>
>> > Le 26/06/2021 =C3=A0 02:39, Go Kudo a =C3=A9crit :
>> > > Hello Internals.
>> > >
>> > > RFC has been reorganized for finalization.
>> > >
>> > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/rng_extension
>> >
>> > 1st I dislike the name "random_ext", why this "_ext" part ?
>> >
>> > 2nd why not following the standard process ?
>> >
>> > 1/ publish on pecl
>> > 2/ merge in php-src if enough success and good feedback
>> >
>> >
>> > Remi
>> >
>> > --
>> > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
>> > To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php
>> >
>> >
>>
>

--000000000000ac65e105c6874e0b--