Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:115274
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABTDVhD9SKNVFrt8NMj4BqdHmsMpSt0DH=SMmb-9C905rgc7PA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGBsUrcomRZhMO=Xd0AtmOb0LsQZtDwxH-8yNOuE=S1vSDF33g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGBsUrcomRZhMO=Xd0AtmOb0LsQZtDwxH-8yNOuE=S1vSDF33g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 22:39:45 +0900
Message-ID: <CABTDVhCZRY=VvxXmEMXw1A=9NFkJA9bfEwyN74f=KpK-Y2_oaw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kamil Tekiela <tekiela246@gmail.com>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000055688205c62417bd"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Add Random Extension (before: Add Random class)
From: zeriyoshi@gmail.com (Go Kudo)

--00000000000055688205c62417bd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> Can it not be simply Random/RandomNumberGenerator?

The interface should be named NumberGenerator\Generator, but since it is
confused with the built-in Generator, it is named RandomNumberGenerator.
The reason for using the NumberGenerator namespace is that some class using
random numbers may be implemented in the future.

> Can you also clarify what happens when serialization or cloning fails?

OK, I've updated it. But these are not special behaviors, they are built on
top of the standard PHP mechanisms.

Regards,
Go Kudo

2021=E5=B9=B46=E6=9C=8826=E6=97=A5(=E5=9C=9F) 17:55 Kamil Tekiela <tekiela2=
46@gmail.com>:

> Hi Go Kudo,
>
> I find this iteration acceptable, but I have one last complaint. Why the
> double namespace? Can it not be simply Random/RandomNumberGenerator?
>
> Can you also clarify what happens when serialization or cloning fails?
>
> Regards,
> Kamil
>

--00000000000055688205c62417bd--