Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:115061
Return-Path: <craig@craigfrancis.co.uk>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 34048 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2021 13:52:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5)
  by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 23 Jun 2021 13:52:40 -0000
Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69CFE1804DA
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 07:11:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Virus: No
X-Envelope-From: <craig@craigfrancis.co.uk>
Received: from mail-lf1-f42.google.com (mail-lf1-f42.google.com [209.85.167.42])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 07:11:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-f42.google.com with SMTP id t17so4435676lfq.0
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 07:11:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=craigfrancis.co.uk; s=default;
        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc;
        bh=adRhiuZK5PrqtXmyRPsFrGsAV4dY1FzKG24BkWry05w=;
        b=hZuY74zttDIvxNJNPx88XXOzQkIK+rF7TZ/O7NAcbY+bRbBlL7zt/FZ52UDQGNH3XC
         U7ZOgYcFegzQ9lkJfpfWcAx4/HRm7hcXX+HnNSWlZ3UQnmnLnuiwzBA5E4JxC4tVNsof
         hO1F/b28NPpPkztIYMOuoT0R51xF7kmK/gwbY=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=adRhiuZK5PrqtXmyRPsFrGsAV4dY1FzKG24BkWry05w=;
        b=ksYUSrmicl7aY7R+Of/okwTLBDwzKdlSHcuIE2ElnEst0mhWon2sXwP053MMv1zp7V
         jvjvUJwTgL6+cD2oGBX9LAYavMAermFV1wMerfhIk6POv33JBKCCYM8KnN74LWiqcpTp
         PavrlaTNs5yYJAADPecZBlAGEmuq7KfzBx90izix+ZvuZyALNPClHw+mVTVCctfiRXxV
         NtvV5CuK1oOZW49yjgx7hrpwCHtTmYS4ME2RyuRxYilordwkebZ07vWIGMRGeUWGgkSg
         +8rYPi7IWJMh37oNJrMMyW7I6Lcm40G/kAxifXXR+Xrq8RbOcTuGYOhtqRDgYyYwNnt3
         0APQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Yi1WC2LISvrIdzyuboDB4gNzozW6QCz9ea4iAjYcaj7Jxbpib
	j8u+G309LywpUFAHR1WVLlFLhB/7TW6N1A5J7OKTnQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwojKHGaE1QQXpWyXnTIVbkqww7NVL5ztvuSEEZXCkjuXIxZyojndOGJFKhmz/x/hLJEhPYTrXRT3MTw4QWo9g=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:33a8:: with SMTP id i8mr6326183lfg.262.1624457468135;
 Wed, 23 Jun 2021 07:11:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFv4g+Gv1qQ2Gtx2Qwo0Dx2Cb_gOXJ=rm7rVy+Jo89PmD-3jnA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAC5V6ghT1vX3QyqCeuoNVE-7j1E8Zae6P64Th-p-WaQf2D1xwA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC5V6ghT1vX3QyqCeuoNVE-7j1E8Zae6P64Th-p-WaQf2D1xwA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 15:10:57 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFv4g+HDp+Y0cGYTjVHtsrSa=L-h2RcdbZXEU=vnGbTZLhJUjQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Guilliam Xavier <guilliam.xavier@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005760c605c56f7aea"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Name issue - is_literal/is_trusted
From: craig@craigfrancis.co.uk (Craig Francis)

--0000000000005760c605c56f7aea
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Wed, 23 Jun 2021 at 11:27 am, Guilliam Xavier <guilliam.xavier@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Alternatively, if integers are too controversial, how about reverting the
> implementation to `is_literal()`
>


Starting to look like that, yeah.

--0000000000005760c605c56f7aea--