Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:114988 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 50533 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2021 20:07:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 21 Jun 2021 20:07:26 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66731804C3 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 13:25:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-lf1-f52.google.com (mail-lf1-f52.google.com [209.85.167.52]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 13:25:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-f52.google.com with SMTP id t17so12070707lfq.0 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 13:25:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=craigfrancis.co.uk; s=default; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=3CzogZ9MD9OZFE1KKdRzJCeFI7CLEXcbwE5yChAOqPg=; b=cOBScPcy+xo6YuUNnal6D96veNS3toMUChklSh2hLwZV90Fsic00OuWl6LH6I4nocf hRhUu7v3u1Pk9Hk1Jr6a5duknV9r3LuC59/vebW0UDkHTUJAKN81MTeZNv/pH17YT+O3 O5a5nl6bUZM737643KIBoMT7TY9zGC/AcYSyk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=3CzogZ9MD9OZFE1KKdRzJCeFI7CLEXcbwE5yChAOqPg=; b=DuUKqUU8HzDCKf5BEEMpvZjcy5XCxZ42+8Psb3P6KyxkAoTaB7D+TBooHL6C3RbQPp TIbzvgGeELJ5pyzzmlHXwlpDdf5doD0BXyrfPk+bRKu92ockMLiV9p+csWW27+vAuj6p TAX6kGryUHCmHvur/9vXCzCStOKBO4faqQtm3/uvEHR2N2dRzeKrjUx6xs+4X7w1JXhw eMG5B4mwqdQaZXpEdUk+jtRUazofAul8upIDRD2V9O1Ai3xEHD22hZ3IGQLmuqfcP1yY 3vTUFXZclt3Ary3cw2qiTKfD7flQuo6LFxKMOCPH+XWk9f4zYxNM7UOTy7fvNA9hpl5y HDXg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532CjP8rGqGCl7L+vk/Psa7OmHoGFTS6wc1lsDuazJpyUlDPc1MK j+n+WJUn6DPpQeUlNifuHEkyyfwd4RXOQcLVHiJt13MUrMM44g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzrJbuX7/yJhyrpwNQac3eqMN4U6XIJF4vHTRJ3G7PLuKp/shGFzcOI00hvYGV/tdHY6MlPRRAjcefjFc+a478= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:548e:: with SMTP id t14mr16658lfk.617.1624307127807; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 13:25:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 21:25:16 +0100 Message-ID: To: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005c025b05c54c79dc" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] is_trusted - was is_literal From: craig@craigfrancis.co.uk (Craig Francis) --0000000000005c025b05c54c79dc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 12 Jun 2021 at 18:00, Craig Francis wrote: > I'd like to start the discussion on the is_literal() RFC: > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/is_literal > To recap, - We have chosen the name is_trusted(), based 18 votes for, vs 3 against. - Integers are now included, which will help adoption: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/is_literal (Joe=E2=80=99s currently updating the implementation to have the new name, = but all the functionality is there). I=E2=80=99m glad this RFC has been well received; and thank you for all the feedback, I really think it=E2=80=98s benefitting the implementation. Craig --0000000000005c025b05c54c79dc--