Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:114927 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 59282 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2021 13:14:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 17 Jun 2021 13:14:29 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5958B1804A8 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:31:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:31:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E403A1338 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 09:31:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap8 ([10.202.2.58]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 17 Jun 2021 09:31:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=21hehTED5/S+Uy2AGw7s5Wl/H5WaalFH66TO8RZTG bk=; b=USvx4XhZZs/0olCpCW1uRKzVPbfy6Sa0Mf55lsLdfAeukog8leTAQ4l8g y6JYTo4bhbFVYe7/hEz0W9P5pvLvbF2pH/H/lVuHQ5N5dhRm6A5FrdLxSbh1O+5g G2zFM33R7CK1FSfHvB9rRJz8200KfMwmXxmRimmManKCBrqi/kdVpjVigY54XswZ SWR7nbWnLw/2YC9mpGNgstYxG88l6ssivu9L4ZQNlnHRIW4ssZiAOrSgusaiKs9r /08ScxuRSvhW4n6NIv2/Gmcv6enLA9DIi2tdoe79qI43Gt9s8mAPW/1Ap7d6PM/1 AqHxL3IwF/iGNuXweCSnXA0c+IfmQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrfeefuddgieegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgfgsehtqhertderreejnecuhfhrohhmpedfnfgr rhhrhicuifgrrhhfihgvlhgufdcuoehlrghrrhihsehgrghrfhhivghlughtvggthhdrtg homheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgeeghefgteejheeggfeghfelueeggfdtjeeivedv tefhveeguedufeelhedvteeinecuffhomhgrihhnpehphhhprdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsth gvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgrrhhrhiesghgrrhhf ihgvlhguthgvtghhrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 380573A0430; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 09:31:27 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-526-gf020ecf851-fm-20210616.001-gf020ecf8 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <39d4b486-a373-4233-81f6-649567f93c57@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20210617100152.166bfed6@mcmic-probook.opensides.be> References: <222b3921-3d9b-47f9-8d13-e6a123f36fad@www.fastmail.com> <20210617100152.166bfed6@mcmic-probook.opensides.be> Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 08:30:43 -0500 To: "php internals" Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [Vote] Partial Function Application From: larry@garfieldtech.com ("Larry Garfield") On Thu, Jun 17, 2021, at 3:01 AM, C=C3=B4me Chilliet wrote: > Le Wed, 16 Jun 2021 11:16:28 -0500, > "Larry Garfield" a =C3=A9crit : >=20 > > Hi folks. The vote for the Partial Function Application RFC is now = open, and > > will run until 30 June. > >=20 > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/partial_function_application >=20 > From the RFC: >=20 > > The ? character was chosen for the placeholder largely because it wa= s > > unambiguous and easy to implement. Prior, similar RFCs (such as the = original > > Pipe Operator proposal from several years ago) used the $$ (lovingly= called > > T_BLING) sigil instead. So far no compelling argument has been provi= ded for > > changing the character, so the RFC is sticking with ?.=20 >=20 > The main argument for $$ is to be able to have partial methods with $$= ->, this > should be stated in this paragraph. That's not something that was ever brought up in the discussion. --Larry Garfield