Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:114803
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAF+90c-W_g9Mt9yMNzBWfMEmQP287a7A6S75RyZo2fvUO2uGXQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEZPtU61cfg4thuHOWOcpVFQo7pjZzgHr3QckiYqC9i=U6exOA@mail.gmail.com> <7a40dd68-6e44-4b2a-83e2-956fe00c9e6e@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7a40dd68-6e44-4b2a-83e2-956fe00c9e6e@www.fastmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 08:21:18 +0700
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU5ecyoc_j_2RzjN3_prfJDDKjN8oGk5qOXmo+6ggtmLUQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com>
Cc: php internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Readonly properties
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

Good morning Larry,

Thank you. Very good summary, maybe worth adding to the RFC :)

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 11:52 PM Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com> wrote:

>  readonly would be a separate, independent feature/syntax.

Yes, my thought is about self explanatory syntax matching common usage
of the same syntax/keyword with other languages. In this case,
readonly, it does not :)

Absolutely not a big deal (one will google that more ;), however I do
like some "consistency" across languages as we almost all rely on many
and get used to syntax for very standard operations like this.

Best,
-- 
Pierre

@pierrejoye