Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:114752 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 94904 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2021 13:15:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (76.75.200.58) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 6 Jun 2021 13:15:48 -0000 To: internals@lists.php.net References: Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2021 14:30:04 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 87.81.129.66 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Propagating AVIF support from libgd into PHP's bundled gd From: marandall@php.net (Mark Randall) Message-ID: On 06/06/2021 14:00, Ben Morss via internals wrote: > Thank you for these comments! > > Perhaps it would make sense to, at some point, create a followup proposal > to namespace the entire gd extension - so that all gd functions would be in > the namespace? I'd leave it to others to determine whether this would be > desirable, or whether it wouldn't be worth making developers update > existing code. When we de-resourcified Gd we considered making the Gd class be useful as something more than an storage type. If doing a full remap it may be worth putting the functions into the class itself.