Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:114690 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 36936 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2021 07:52:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 2 Jun 2021 07:52:39 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 524AC1804BE for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 01:05:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-pj1-f50.google.com (mail-pj1-f50.google.com [209.85.216.50]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 01:05:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-f50.google.com with SMTP id o17-20020a17090a9f91b029015cef5b3c50so2986340pjp.4 for ; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 01:05:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=DoanfVCOYZpEjdJ9v/BGVQVk/LrlJeCMKXsiH2aRU0Q=; b=K4oiG7BYftGCgg2PDZ2A+gOyMf4nvZjtkkXUndvsRgxC7V1NH6M5K5+krhWq25y1bs v1R0oIgh4p1KZS5GqlhQlEvsnw/yNRMxOgYlNEURhcDBy2ftEZFVUC4LCicHRwuAW1Ia mwbtDuKRn4XmtzG3YMOA6/U7C8OwK5PSrzrtRrt9T5d9ABPRAIi2srOmo78mJCVLROOW qvcDFJhx9UWakQ4bO2XcJhhqizpA1YOICc6J6RCjSIirCsJYcORy5tQE9BdxT33Ij0vy Fe+xBBZU218WWwGlh3nJx9CbG+aVOirks4+Dy8HiKwsbMSQ0c+EgTM8PIx7IAbiyEVPP cDng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DoanfVCOYZpEjdJ9v/BGVQVk/LrlJeCMKXsiH2aRU0Q=; b=t1NY6hh8nS3lBUQZuj2NEtnuMyl54xcoyNZ2CsOn6xF3Rn+4Q5w4NgYSNfVfSp7Y+M FPEr+7ouXmqctNXRzUN80VZDdbHq+d7Qeh3egBg3mJyEzJjj1YilOQtln4uyaihOXzn/ x3DDB1iOK3x+rqP2Zca7i3bQTbQCSnd7hEpxbdbTNr2nRPDo+pzE8STLPkRJqVrD29w/ 43CadBTEUACNU4vB4KcvmdQFqTuEkPVs0Kof67RXkyQEkS0pxTrn697lYmgu9HslVm2n CN+FXzoSfdeR9SU35BXIGf5Mbyj4Qw3L8pkatcjiCfQpyGXJaJaUgSsUbmbH/pSj6SMB 5OtQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53133bVvDTifhoficeWriXlG/8Br3686NaEXmUJXbZWOXrZVmO+s +RjXyjALj9k7QEd1aTJRQXAMF83LLASBLuVX3mc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyTLuOKhzSid3NOzQ9tkeHURdEHrVHEYmWFcPQnna9yj4JbslQhDA8C2UN/wcchD3l+/xxDaWfbTv6M0I6n/yc= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7587:b029:109:69bd:3eae with SMTP id j7-20020a1709027587b029010969bd3eaemr5013018pll.40.1622621147893; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 01:05:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 10:05:37 +0200 Message-ID: To: "G. P. B." Cc: PHP Internals List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000020117c05c3c3ed85" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Vote] Final constants From: kocsismate90@gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?TcOhdMOpIEtvY3Npcw==?=) --00000000000020117c05c3c3ed85 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Internals, I've just closed the vote, and the RFC is accepted with 28 votes in favor and 4 against. Regards: M=C3=A1t=C3=A9 M=C3=A1t=C3=A9 Kocsis ezt =C3=ADrta (id=C5=91pont:= 2021. m=C3=A1j. 24., H, 10:14): > Hi George, > > Being able to override interface constants by default might seem like a > regression, but I believe making interface constant behavior consistent w= ith > class constants is worth this, and also, I don't see any other good way t= o > fix the weird inheritance behavior Nikita highlighted than to do what the > RFC > currently proposes. > > Regards: > M=C3=A1t=C3=A9 > > --00000000000020117c05c3c3ed85--