Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:114676 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 45209 invoked from network); 31 May 2021 10:30:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 31 May 2021 10:30:35 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB440180211 for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 03:43:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-wr1-f43.google.com (mail-wr1-f43.google.com [209.85.221.43]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 03:43:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-f43.google.com with SMTP id m18so10441488wrv.2 for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 03:43:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=w0ocKQ++hfrB9tvJgGynEXdnI0d7nVmxBNn9kCMxG7E=; b=cCDqcgnZmazqsafGggPJa071mGFJR2vPFnBTc9GJnT3hmWaZBep6ZcginmZ/NBIWsL E0CVaoA5crl0a3tCAocfMwNmkNWRmgfJjCtQpiRPiZAKuK8ML6pROa40vF6MEermDClF y9HskXkO24d7Qx+LvnlJQqBQstxdCpqghbX1xlrxUX4t+sOQRbVGfpN0NXGqtRHp5m9P GI96P5mqI/QhmqJwtrHhQJsH43w1X4mNBiIphzTQsd/YKd7aPsA6ZOReDGpmsZDtUVPX 9NlWvAQsw2SBJgEgeRiJN+LdHh1hIRaFPjGXIUkUA8TAxaD/vbBQTZADPeQzsCsWfVX/ p69w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=w0ocKQ++hfrB9tvJgGynEXdnI0d7nVmxBNn9kCMxG7E=; b=hc3kr4v7iF/UGPsait1t4OLlFU52sTVWqULeX+uxX36+aqkA8tR4gpyGTCVKfLC4QX bykcrRlnm4rY2Pzz1S+ByBKRLiKLvBYAgJTa2/rPqvMOABQrrFmPOlw6ic/6cd9Ma2FY bYzpGqcHznNRQ30S/6/GLh8lteRBK5vB84gTH4qW1htTyHWzHr4M39iIEcjcSHvZ50Vi fW1PAwQGvyiwsEr0+dice3kag09mf4yj471AHs2CGLiimqHUacpJ5Tva0EI3SuaXruF2 9Dr8Ld6Ivw5U4mui332hqFQb9NsECSZQkFlpn+ThkzWYGOaiEnFqnMzNOlo4hzuALzct +lkw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531SeDEBQPT3r27jF4OCeTkoyRNQQsLIorgx4foG6/g3jIfWg8bd QlYMvf35oJkSzSUA8crQxpKu0AZk48MI4hu7FYJRAjtNAq+cOQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJywbAkPWXZH26p+jjZSXdqOYXvLAxq+nnF8Nicfd7F6JJhNooXJ3MdjbvPtzRzLcaXkNHZyepOLuwVM/4WQWq8= X-Received: by 2002:adf:fa04:: with SMTP id m4mr2936200wrr.275.1622457797405; Mon, 31 May 2021 03:43:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <44ac7866-75ef-44ab-a5f9-4e571652b5e6@www.fastmail.com> <0782ea44-6e5b-40fe-87d6-4b0fb12c9dba@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <0782ea44-6e5b-40fe-87d6-4b0fb12c9dba@www.fastmail.com> Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 13:43:06 +0300 Message-ID: To: Larry Garfield Cc: php internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] Short functions, take 2 From: someniatko@gmail.com (someniatko) > Unless there is any significant feedback, I'll be calling a vote for this RFC sometime late this week (Thursday/Friday-ish). Hi! As a regular PHP developer, I am very interested in having this quality-of-life feature: it allows code whose intent is more functional-ish (mapping input arguments to an output expression), than imperative-ish (do this then do that), to look more appropriate. Is it planned to be voted or it's just forgotten :P?