Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:114673 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 36848 invoked from network); 31 May 2021 09:28:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 31 May 2021 09:28:06 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24AC01804E3 for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 02:40:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-lj1-f172.google.com (mail-lj1-f172.google.com [209.85.208.172]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 02:40:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-f172.google.com with SMTP id a4so14220643ljd.5 for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 02:40:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rGE6qnD4BGdqiA3z/YqWbPeXkk4C7VGJAgthU19qHWY=; b=T8leCTqBHWXnTr9HWnm+GNjL2uHWRVP3X+gGDv14+wIGay+dAhjRMLiDIvno7h1CHO /9WSXcd9Ja9V4MGYhyLTbsvkK1m7uxIr7E8oG+8aMa+rNcbivdhCAW4IgPICk0Z1GayG phIuTARSyYG8LLGhMrk0rQiywIN2nC5Bki+fB7TAkQrzbT7HxcS+I/J1tl1c1SjzqKdI MR2LKwwKZx5vxWkFCNfM0pP6vNTIKVocGzus1kAQe4sTbg0q3t339Nd04ggsQ35B4ywO TBeaVDdhGN9O7ClpJwyjnbbZIibAto/C2i396gq3wu3HTtfxAOppkgBSGuRT0+8/vHRL k6TQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rGE6qnD4BGdqiA3z/YqWbPeXkk4C7VGJAgthU19qHWY=; b=ib4SugPf26NVwNqfjOqwRZsu7bMOk5gR+gJ+8Y1TCiBqVnDShNSWDFiJgN7IHNEju2 1cw9HbtedZt8n0doqcAe94rqSFaw96VcZEFhM+cwefiBWJcqmnhmsuo74sJK5parj6gy LrSZhKbdu6f6I1WHDa3aIsx6t7nSATTqnf6GpUGoeBZXEdVTbvLRY9/CfAvne3RW2dXt jvKp5vL9gipONpCX7mq33bi9DDG4TR77rmOC+UIUqCnGC29aB2oWogskyFGdfNLH2ACJ P/4WAWLJhpPmYdt51jvTTEeE/HVTs30NrHwx7c4Xwr14pvx1PHyCjEGM8ZINdKapAaux j8pw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530IzfkluSxDpsTTXfyI0d+EuAB+QH4YeYN47oP5R4QIRonaKqWX 1vreVDUSRNMJ8YhgYhwumfM1Z+NVB4y8ALiFvMc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy35WEr5xY5rbzKfE/uc6kGVceC5TC/1eYyF9TvUyrUcl8Q28fpCKOp5+kwzw3vGZ9lH1uDxniTxrO8TfjzY6I= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a41a:: with SMTP id p26mr16232021ljn.272.1622454047615; Mon, 31 May 2021 02:40:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1815820036.3212683.1621007783673.JavaMail.zimbra@dafert.at> <0729fdcc-ece7-4261-ba28-9f72161495e6@www.fastmail.com> <3e8087a1-f8b3-3a7f-c048-6c61218d0710@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <3e8087a1-f8b3-3a7f-c048-6c61218d0710@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 11:40:31 +0200 Message-ID: To: "Christoph M. Becker" Cc: Mel Dafert , php internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002c2d6205c39d05ea" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Add IntlDatePatternGenerator From: nikita.ppv@gmail.com (Nikita Popov) --0000000000002c2d6205c39d05ea Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 4:25 PM Christoph M. Becker wrote: > On 29.05.2021 at 10:02, Mel Dafert wrote: > > >> Agreed with Nikita. There's no compelling reason to add double-API > style anymore. It may take a second RFC to modify this one to remove > those, technically, but I'd vote for it. > > > > Should this new RFC then only apply to IntlDatePatternGenerator, or > should it also > > clarify that future additions to the intl extension (or to extensions in > general?) > > should not add both styles and prefer OO style if possible? > > IMO, an RFC which generally "forbids" the introduction of new dual APIs > would make sense. I don't think that we *need* an RFC to remove the > procedural API of IntlDatePatternGenerator. > Right, for the purposes of this RFC, it's okay to just drop them if there are no objections. A general policy RFC may still be useful for future reference. Nikita --0000000000002c2d6205c39d05ea--