Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:114672
Return-Path: <derick@php.net>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 7340 invoked from network); 30 May 2021 22:20:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5)
  by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 30 May 2021 22:20:17 -0000
Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0992A1804C9
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sun, 30 May 2021 15:32:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,
	SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Virus: No
X-Envelope-From: <derick@php.net>
Received: from xdebug.org (xdebug.org [82.113.146.227])
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sun, 30 May 2021 15:32:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.42.60] (host81-159-84-188.range81-159.btcentralplus.com [81.159.84.188])
	by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD40610C02C;
	Sun, 30 May 2021 23:32:52 +0100 (BST)
Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 23:32:51 +0100
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <CAG9XoMQ2mopubCpRJyZHk++EsYM+6-AFRhE5cq7E4UsuxLFdcQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAG9XoMRfa10yV1UNOypKGwGhObMtwoUOqVzR6PHh_Ai-GYbeXQ@mail.gmail.com> <9ECA71F4-F57A-4184-9713-0EF8B7131F97@php.net> <CAG9XoMQ2mopubCpRJyZHk++EsYM+6-AFRhE5cq7E4UsuxLFdcQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: Benjamin Morel <benjamin.morel@gmail.com>
CC: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Message-ID: <C67B6248-EC7C-40B7-843B-639127ECF9A8@php.net>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] DateTimeZone silently falls back to UTC when providing seconds
From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans)

On 30 May 2021 23:18:31 BST, Benjamin Morel <benjamin=2Emorel@gmail=2Ecom> =
wrote:
>>
>> I can't think of why this couldn't work=2E Duke a bug report please at
>> bugs=2Ephp=2Enet?
>
>
>Before doing so, shouldn't we discuss whether it makes sense to accept
>a
>time-zone offset with seconds, when the granularity seems to be 15
>mins?
>
>https://en=2Ewikipedia=2Eorg/wiki/List_of_UTC_time_offsets
>
>=E2=80=94 Benjamin

No need=2E Early timezone offsets in the timezone database are in LMT (loc=
al mean time), which have second granularity=2E

cheers,
Derick