Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:114636 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 90234 invoked from network); 27 May 2021 12:32:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 27 May 2021 12:32:12 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625AF180211 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 05:43:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from processus.org (ns366368.ip-94-23-14.eu [94.23.14.201]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 05:43:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from authenticated-user (PRIMARY_HOSTNAME [PUBLIC_IP]) by processus.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 71C9C5101324 for ; Thu, 27 May 2021 12:43:56 +0000 (UTC) To: internals@lists.php.net References: <80fb5a8e-d770-49fd-45d5-ea6f4b004513@gmail.com> <2874cf7c-e55d-4100-bb01-af11a5ab6e87@www.fastmail.com> <93bee614-8bca-7e35-94a6-518beafac8ba@processus.org> Message-ID: <444b93d1-d59b-0315-0896-eb0fa665b8f0@processus.org> Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 14:43:55 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Authentication-Results: processus.org; auth=pass smtp.auth=pierre-php@processus.org smtp.mailfrom=pierre-php@processus.org X-Spamd-Bar: / Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Consensus Gathering: is_initialized From: pierre-php@processus.org (Pierre) Le 27/05/2021 à 14:18, Michał Marcin Brzuchalski a écrit : > Please take no offense. I just think it's not that common. > While I do work with many integration projects most of the time already > could forget about writing my own stuff for this kind of thing where I have > learned to rely on community-developed components > which just speeds up development and just gets the things done. > > I think described cases are rarely needing such function especially > if it's easy to write one using reflection. > > My personal preference is to reduce the amount of standard library shipped > than add. > > Cheers, > Michał Marcin Brzuchalski Don't worry, no offense taken ! I'm sorry if my message sounded otherwise. Regards, -- Pierre