Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:114605
Return-Path: <calvin@cmpct.info>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 26108 invoked from network); 26 May 2021 01:26:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5)
  by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 26 May 2021 01:26:13 -0000
Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0B9180211
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 25 May 2021 18:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Virus: No
X-Envelope-From: <calvin@cmpct.info>
Received: from supercat.cmpct.info (supercat.cmpct.info [71.19.146.230])
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 25 May 2021 18:37:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.29] (fctnnbsc38w-142-167-240-56.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net [142.167.240.56])
	by supercat.cmpct.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0604A3FC63;
	Wed, 26 May 2021 01:37:33 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cmpct.info;
	s=default; t=1621993054;
	bh=mw8yodOgsVbPWmAd46B8cE8Zq7WX8u6KdXfXVUjTzd0=;
	h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References;
	b=Ikp5oaSgFqh+jv2AE7yFq/mpFFsekGw02KdtgBhGqDQ5zCXWEtqEi0mxZ04TL1S2o
	 ztLw823U71liYY58yOuHaJB5I58WP4+wau6jMQvfdZRoV9uG50zilEUX3qwbaFlnKt
	 e9vKiscVEGTNCf52CC2TIkoIJ8cN8lQeb7+yCpuA=
Message-ID: <f4bb01ccb008a828e843dbe82d4d18a657ab3498.camel@cmpct.info>
To: "G. P. B." <george.banyard@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 22:37:31 -0300
In-Reply-To: <CAFPFaMKJqf0=PsnXHXMK9T=e87jS_LE_Cbph3ZWu3bq3tmhZWw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <194DA850-19F7-41C4-97CF-944F13B57AFD@cmpct.info>
	 <7AD8D5D3-C70E-40C3-B55E-A4C9E4ECDA44@cmpct.info>
	 <CAFPFaMKJqf0=PsnXHXMK9T=e87jS_LE_Cbph3ZWu3bq3tmhZWw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.4 (3.38.4-1.fc33) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Using clang-analyzer with PHP: experiences?
From: calvin@cmpct.info (Calvin Buckley)

Good point, but I'm still on GCC 10 in Fedora. I haven't tried its
static analyzer yet either. That said, I don't know how GCC's analyzer
handles PHP's ewhateveralloc functions - that is, if it'd do better
than LLVM.

On Tue, 2021-05-25 at 23:43 +0100, G. P. B. wrote:
> Isn't this handled by the GCC 11?