Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:114563 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 95505 invoked from network); 24 May 2021 08:10:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 24 May 2021 08:10:36 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF3FF1804DF for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 01:21:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-oi1-f169.google.com (mail-oi1-f169.google.com [209.85.167.169]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 01:21:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-f169.google.com with SMTP id v22so26408005oic.2 for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 01:21:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Cgb2O7pBe8ie5C+m6Zi8xEDipslQr0/4CKyxzES/1PM=; b=E4Hf4ca4mwYYchmv5WYuXSqa46va4c3Qhmb5S+JbsFH8Cfd8LrGT/wzoQMMl3obIHW ln9MeQrR9Pa09GNJebTkcej+MvqhXHk4z0ZVByU2OLb6XGjz7J9XkEXmOfyqSGFopYye +Vz2MIxcFjDMrozOfOF4HGX3SiZDf0kU2VwSsPjBf+vw1hcBeb8da7pF6lyg6WU5xy12 AxzanXmA8DVUiF0lzLUFIrIhMPWKJBAcDxFVFWHivpO5X9b6Hz9lgeEreCmZYn/F/mT/ ubCb0c7erKpwLnVzMer2WLNjnT/vrZhSWFX0PeTc+upGQ8gRUwFjGYIb8MynwNMl+LHs vTtQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Cgb2O7pBe8ie5C+m6Zi8xEDipslQr0/4CKyxzES/1PM=; b=G2UxkhxuOqKlBj2smCoqjpujashU16IZMp4T936vokOomZTKpmbUNFtH4oQwAjeas4 KMQjh6tqJ2kv7js5XIAkhkf/2nLg++ZvkOVIlaQ3OTupmlgh3GpAu7SQQsjlVKPj0O8R JHkGoFrVjHbViZE1UGlqEow95fQp/tqBIHjlja3wmdkPhVjck1138vX9ZxTl9YeW21Kg 4dQ9aYdmvlmZlHfUkz8k4owF6Xr+EP21LOyrX2NVTNTYMP13Ztrl5/52O+Wu/OegrXYg WND7nxYNRtTWVRpadH07QYYCgg5FN/PiFwzoSz9Dd4O4ikqfUApxjACI8Ql2B0HEnAS2 An6A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532x/lV0by2If69VxCo5XqErV6RsDQOi7/lpklz9gsQsUDvpI5Lh /ZHtsotVmHG9m6VETpwpWqa2M5ut8PuQ7UOF3N/MahLvdgI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwPlLg64mSJTDrv5KqF56BObvYGIeYoY+OUbV+pCl7H+3F/btoWc4UlC7ZemEa98t77ZLy9lvZl6JNac+7Dj50= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:30cb:: with SMTP id hi11mr23575938pjb.204.1621844086902; Mon, 24 May 2021 01:14:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 10:14:35 +0200 Message-ID: To: "G. P. B." Cc: PHP Internals List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ae54f805c30f00e8" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Vote] Final constants From: kocsismate90@gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?TcOhdMOpIEtvY3Npcw==?=) --000000000000ae54f805c30f00e8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi George, Being able to override interface constants by default might seem like a regression, but I believe making interface constant behavior consistent wit= h class constants is worth this, and also, I don't see any other good way to fix the weird inheritance behavior Nikita highlighted than to do what the RFC currently proposes. Regards: M=C3=A1t=C3=A9 --000000000000ae54f805c30f00e8--