Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:114520 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 45011 invoked from network); 18 May 2021 21:52:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 18 May 2021 21:52:39 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C96831804B1 for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 15:02:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-yb1-f180.google.com (mail-yb1-f180.google.com [209.85.219.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 15:02:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb1-f180.google.com with SMTP id n83so4486692ybg.0 for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 15:02:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=datadoghq.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=tVek8DozQXEo6plJwgDQlLqpScQ8ZJofx4OQLGMPzGA=; b=dD8sShx7QR3lrHtl6ZPqErL+dXTI2+foGjMbEX+qO7+bsaCM5X8xHWbpDxprNbjGEP 4NJ9ZKIACAuXLLK4UrUmOPZx6CS4qZ2gTB9RnuIcZao6T1c6xkuC+kHVPzFjwIEPqVhi Z8VHKjwXaVuv9/lSqAA7omExFoqlaMUa5wC3w= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tVek8DozQXEo6plJwgDQlLqpScQ8ZJofx4OQLGMPzGA=; b=H0Nxdq7UK23mu/J1BEgMI5IuiGrm71wgRrK+Z6bEY97ANHTOPEnkZ7QX5egvT7JxG0 Xh/BCmROHHQo8wALEqC53/co3JgmoZK6hCR3UoqfWjZIEjRkMK2Ex1bIkC/n09c9o5G/ gMaWp6W6XKy3yI6fDrwreu8DMipnTCa+gP4+nc4IURsecYfajRKjtKY3fRbxHaaLu4+u x//4yjs4ykXJ0upXo3wcs+BxwOz1XsSZWRIBeduOUDjDta8R6Yy+OMS5Qast0SlQFAzN YDOLRj7hOOKz0W4Yjkx0pOSpZsFmkhZZyEyCmXkj/QDwxf522xhzhauylrRyMI3tbJEZ YeQg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533QhJ0XPaBzGzECs2mtGrfOadeew6HjcplsKjo83wmWmcuZ34Pk akNxqZiFirodqIQdwxxD0eQFpPf1q3BpotW76eWbig== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzIZeILuwubrlZkVx0xuqpLbbT7L/io8QiHTvbB/QHEJHW24KMvOQ1YkUc9nIxqcsc7VB0J2O97ls1KwLrXXOc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:1243:: with SMTP id t3mr10111294ybu.402.1621375334774; Tue, 18 May 2021 15:02:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1565EB81-57B7-49B0-A47C-342E0088A432@trowski.com> <532D1413-52FF-4403-A20B-BBDB51163C85@trowski.com> <9c83ba12-79e1-4fc6-9a75-7a6b04965f03@www.fastmail.com> <38aa478b-dfd8-f62f-7803-5fc9499e5077@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Levi Morrison Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 16:02:04 -0600 Message-ID: To: David Gebler Cc: Rowan Tommins , PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Partial function application From: internals@lists.php.net ("Levi Morrison via internals") > I don't know what the answer is here, I'm reading through the entire thread > and RFC again and trying to better formulate in my mind how I'd [like to] > reason about this in terms of syntax. But the more I think about it, the > more I realise much as I loved the idea when I first read the RFC, now I'm > worried we're rushing to include something (because there's an > implementation, more or less ready to go) which maybe should go back to the > drawing board for a bit of a re-think. Some of the RFC authors have been discussing this a lot based on feedback. In a [previous message][1] I said we would message the list when it's ready for re-review. It's still not ready, but we seem to be driving towards consensus. I wish everyone would hold the discussion until then because they are discussing an outdated thing and causing noise, but it's not something I can control. [1]: https://externals.io/message/114157#114500