Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:114440
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAF+90c8X-PUjVq0r10qLg1-Op1SoJbdRbLKgXwvgg=W29CYUiQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <f73fbb7b-5080-a555-80ac-8640601b49e3@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <f73fbb7b-5080-a555-80ac-8640601b49e3@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 15:53:17 +0200
Message-ID: <CAF+90c-pk=cNqQeoQwA_9tZSH1ieF1Z9RcixUkZtZLrPS=SZ6A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@gmx.de>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002415db05c22256d2"
Subject: Re: Disable interactive mode (-a) if readline not available
From: nikita.ppv@gmail.com (Nikita Popov)

--0000000000002415db05c22256d2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 3:42 PM Christoph M. Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de>
wrote:

> On 12.05.2021 at 10:12, Nikita Popov wrote:
>
> > I think we would be better off disabling -a completely if readline is not
> > available, and exit with a helpful error message. I've opened
> > https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/6976 to that effect. Does that sound
> > reasonable?
>
> I'm in favor of dropping the interactive mode.  Thank you for the PR!
>
> I wonder, though, if there is even a difference between `php -a`
> (without readline) and `php` (besides the "interactive mode" message).
>

I don't think there's any difference.

Nikita

--0000000000002415db05c22256d2--