Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:114413 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 99086 invoked from network); 11 May 2021 16:50:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 11 May 2021 16:50:30 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910D2180508 for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 09:58:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-qk1-f179.google.com (mail-qk1-f179.google.com [209.85.222.179]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 09:58:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk1-f179.google.com with SMTP id v8so1470520qkv.1 for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 09:58:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TVYfp3TpswpeYZmjYQti4mtlr3XRzaYc6tiLHZxVtDQ=; b=K9JwOiuyd+f020vzFs/EWDUQQI6GKorERdbRI5WZhm2iqY9YEJY5whO+X+Dybr90zS j5WPFK19ssniXKARCjW9hJDHHPt+d8JGQliOu7TFwYwanNe/QDLKRRyFiPSVeQCUaT/7 8umYr/YK/2FmZBZAWCeQ1ebQ5FuiBpvgwQ9Up2UgyAULV+J6JyCZHJP9vEDtjMcoE07i B0MrmbhqnJ0ODCypKVoCyU7TK4F9VU0QMi5TG4n48zqvPH7rwjh6ToDlRglw09LLUFho D745DSOcaIZBa6oZWB3rME6wI5fPCRKxc4u4lQ95s7pbfpmwtZgMRLwTKrp4pZa6dQcK Rhew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TVYfp3TpswpeYZmjYQti4mtlr3XRzaYc6tiLHZxVtDQ=; b=G17moe7IwJtvhEmP0vdBJU91YwaYe2lvNvijpDxJN7rZPYJFz0naeH4q7IZYgNJd4k ZdhIdBYoM9i0S/RLSYAMHq4+2s3gE1SWKvVXdIbqLo6ei60GHEEX+IeRAYo7ZFO06+SK fNq7ugTrJzo5AFP5Acc3D0DXWuQVrUsrLLKhIGJwhUEaLGY+wuR5EGmmx47HenPzKoCA Ge14xjhXYjfhqvhSYPR3Dz/7xc1oeHR8Whp7mcWE8lPvPDv3joscZMiUkSd6LGi4vOM5 w8OAnQ4+8ghJHLNKtNv8lXW0Jpz3/QfG7TTll6zF55n/Xg7UC7PBVYWSOLtgjkfdgWUe doXw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530g5IwLfBnr5HxRR4SJzpib2CoXXZ9WviFvATK7UU3M3qmO3DhI jOjCuCkuNJTTFC3We0cKOypNUnhVt94d6MbtGko= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzY3wgc/oQv6xAmgdY+6jmtJFLFSsh0d7hnRZmggcNY35th8PKwPzlp78ZWDb/3kczYvZwKak1eLpplVoE/STg= X-Received: by 2002:a37:4284:: with SMTP id p126mr10321288qka.501.1620752297695; Tue, 11 May 2021 09:58:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 17:58:06 +0100 Message-ID: To: Peter Bowyer Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f91df005c210cc76" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Could we drop the bottom-posting rule? From: tekiela246@gmail.com (Kamil Tekiela) --000000000000f91df005c210cc76 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > I doubt "bottom posting" is a term people who started online in the last 10 years know - with today/yesterday's example, my takeaway was the original poster didn't know what it meant. Yeah, the first time I heard about it is on this mailing list. I didn't know it was a thing before, and I admit I might still not understand why it is a thing. All my life I have been used to "newest first". Whenever I encountered a website or an email that asked me to scroll for the newer content it upset me. Now I see that some developers prefer this style. It could also be the fault of user agents that don't scroll/hide the old content and force me to read it again. --000000000000f91df005c210cc76--