Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:114410 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 95134 invoked from network); 11 May 2021 16:48:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 11 May 2021 16:48:29 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E32D1804DB for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 09:56:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from darkcity.gna.ch (darkcity.gna.ch [195.49.47.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 09:56:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a02:1205:502d:fa80:4515:f93e:6f38:be99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by darkcity.gna.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9774915149D5 for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 18:56:14 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.43\)) Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 18:56:14 +0200 References: <0923caf3-12f0-f10b-8e9d-3e07ee267ebe@processus.org> To: PHP internals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <591444CA-CE36-4C55-9566-2F3925BA72B9@cschneid.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Could we drop the bottom-posting rule? From: cschneid@cschneid.com (Christian Schneider) Am 11.05.2021 um 18:42 schrieb Kamil Tekiela : > Compare the two messages from Sara, the first where she top posted and = the > second where she bottom posted. Which one is more clear? > https://imgur.com/TUiHval The second one which shows me what Sara is referring to. Imagine it just said "I don't know what Mel is talking about" without = you seeing what Mel said right away. > I completely agree with Good Guy. Top posting is just way more = convenient. I disagree. What some people call inter-posting as way more convenient because it = has the context of what you are referring to right next to your answer. And yes: People *should* trim down the context. It also forces you to go = through the email and remove what is irrelevant. Every second you spend = making your message clearer and quicker to digest will save many seconds = on the reading end. - Chris