Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:114406
Return-Path: <tekiela246@gmail.com>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 89037 invoked from network); 11 May 2021 16:34:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5)
  by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 11 May 2021 16:34:50 -0000
Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A897180211
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 11 May 2021 09:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,
	FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,
	SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Virus: No
X-Envelope-From: <tekiela246@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qv1-f43.google.com (mail-qv1-f43.google.com [209.85.219.43])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 11 May 2021 09:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-f43.google.com with SMTP id g5so4844217qvk.1
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 11 May 2021 09:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=QIYgg+O5n+J/WwoAUP+CBY9z26Iz8qRCle2AiGvFcXY=;
        b=mIDnK33CGQvV5gAPotrvX1aJ7zZ7zyGKmv0eMZcf+eJbUez5o2Bgs7dHPMzxgHhMtZ
         Gur6YOXzdMFBWf5I5gKH/NR3zxkyvasvyvpg1FmF1VWt/e1VX/sA1Rh/z2dBHMKm/1cu
         yBBQ07e96fpvQY3OmkVEHM6f+bKb+NsiGuNLgaAK2rvNIVG4kfdfSwwqKU/p7sUo3t2M
         tiKoAXgZpzlt5d8OdetnCXF9PAAW1zTdMgI54p6Qc2nHbt6HzNujVSwUoEdOE8NihhVK
         /4+iXNGsBMPDyM0RJdXxgVlasXfa+9PqXu/szEOWaEggCLmrqK9+agWbXkyOO/LtDIhr
         E1eQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=QIYgg+O5n+J/WwoAUP+CBY9z26Iz8qRCle2AiGvFcXY=;
        b=FRU9QdjYVMVSbXcYai3Uafskmx3HPwDdz2y5PiXx/dek3E2G/ucYTLGynFP4ybQyU8
         7W1xG7teNZSHJUzKWIcWwfPzzHqN7TuO6gYoe8lIiVbYIlqW0C1HofjHDRmnNLKCVyEZ
         P9a6bLzuXqeQ0dZc4tGuaS6Jqa3xBgTbI1KsLXyOqff3pTyCRYF23wGI4niGwC+rLWJs
         9tpxheTFZi9Evjr3gHbwtmJx8BYEs+rH7Om2BN2u3KQodVj2E4HJY9j2j6cR4LTof/xK
         QVdpko1EJPk47YyAPF0cYx3fha7Sq19PZuj+hbaTMIPlSNr5ap/U7OZK/15A8DbJRKF0
         gcuw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5336qgGjeAiceokRES9JLhNFl06qTF19nLU4VlHGeyJ3hWErvtVB
	kdISGEa7jyObjNtve40O+gAnpVoJuAjXasYIN09AjIsn6Mff6w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyxtzf/GPlXOA9qQJmC+OrPDLoQZpF75TUeyiJebWfdc5fBOlGtTRuQbP/UdLOto6t/A0pKfAORxEzqO2Wn+gU=
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:e9c6:: with SMTP id q6mr29887522qvo.15.1620751356327;
 Tue, 11 May 2021 09:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAGBsUrePAey_fdAq0S_XtcnPhcXsB=tgnff0TUNfPo-AtTEheQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <0923caf3-12f0-f10b-8e9d-3e07ee267ebe@processus.org> <s7ebt4$42r$1@ciao.gmane.io>
In-Reply-To: <s7ebt4$42r$1@ciao.gmane.io>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 17:42:25 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGBsUreFTkkqVM+3o03ka6GmCjw4WcdSDyLsiohPGtMXNx4yAw@mail.gmail.com>
To: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000dcfe8a05c21094dc"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Could we drop the bottom-posting rule?
From: tekiela246@gmail.com (Kamil Tekiela)

--000000000000dcfe8a05c21094dc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Compare the two messages from Sara, the first where she top posted and the
second where she bottom posted. Which one is more clear?
https://imgur.com/TUiHval

I completely agree with Good Guy. Top posting is just way more convenient.

--000000000000dcfe8a05c21094dc--