Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:114378 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 35914 invoked from network); 11 May 2021 12:50:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 11 May 2021 12:50:12 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63CD71804CC for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 05:57:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-ed1-f50.google.com (mail-ed1-f50.google.com [209.85.208.50]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 05:57:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-f50.google.com with SMTP id f1so500014edt.4 for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 05:57:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=yHMQdAzpv8Sw9rQCSdhU1d9b8dTTTOIOW7tqJhkzsd4=; b=kl4uKdbTCRHJzg6HPHTqxY4fLrJTx+NgZDJ2XAiVKbXitD20m0wDJhCUiYWYnxU+u6 OO1SA9ZWvSyVwdK9z7mfCs7Wi3WV/fNbPVc+tsZzJPlWfOyN4g2BKPBuxTp4o21ebJYL 6S+wDqmR5d5GZPJIMIZCZZC0vYmoxjgdCaUa8dx9H7j6FYhlEt8VDNpcK0OwAZNPistU rp98jBItAi0BJ4NhW5aOYxM9EiBgxKTNEVSE7jIKIZzrfFw6KGHqiP1diz5HLv0eYM/z faclGR+QXqYM4myuDLgYuSY5v3xU2G+PCB3jER3VfhcumrLvztsVmDD9W8NHVj+WY50O 07uA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=yHMQdAzpv8Sw9rQCSdhU1d9b8dTTTOIOW7tqJhkzsd4=; b=KwBI4/Qw3JVDdcul9TUQLlvv64XlyDmKyghZmOs83dPiVz2ckOtIXJ6IdYPPwDxtXP vm1ADR3Kv/phST32hi7dldv/0P4Ii1LthnQhcnTX+fb2iq0v1ymFk3nZMAIx+BI+qWFn 5bZM+XTHOSYKBPmjpwX0U9PEtdE4fqJRSv5DHi69ukKi+ViNqc0nNojSFctk/EHypxaM 96mGCCRLwDLg+5KqAmsTcVG1Zv3fUsr5n5KrfYNei+5yfdaquJhAR39lhFqabA1rb5FP I5/2PAs8ojmcIQxzAJzlgQvi9l2Xei2DxTEedKn/PE9a52cm3QuIL7KSx1yZUJjGPcE2 ehew== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531/pQk9N6S1m5jhm5UOk0FxTuhk4ovhD54VBsnyrB/SMwkBjvw7 /uZdNywi2kOQGRBTmjgM1EpG+ZIMJjwmf+xkkomzo8MiF8M= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwq6nDE+PklRlvRHYNPyHsVtqMRNc4SFZREpRcnPFVf8B1PaToKopFlUBiyg0bg2lJQhFXMfAtmjxaKGDSY+Lc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:2d6:: with SMTP id b22mr36392418edx.274.1620737873578; Tue, 11 May 2021 05:57:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 21:57:42 +0900 Message-ID: To: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003a8cf805c20d7111" Subject: Discussion: Object-scoped RNG From: zeriyoshi@gmail.com (Go Kudo) --0000000000003a8cf805c20d7111 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi internals. I previously proposed an object scope RNG implementation inside. However, the RFC was rejected after a vote. https://wiki.php.net/rfc/object_scope_prng Vote: https://externals.io/message/113888 Discussion: https://externals.io/message/112819 As per my previous proposal, PHP is currently in a very unclear state regarding the random number implementation. So I would like to ask a few questions. - Do you think that PHP needs an object-scoped random number implementation? And why? - If the API in the previous RFC was improved and voted on again, would you be willing to vote for it? - What issues do you think should have been resolved between proposal and ballot in the previous RFC? I would like a variety of opinions. Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version) Regards, Go Kudo --0000000000003a8cf805c20d7111--