Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:114374
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1620635361.9147.0@gmail.com> <CAF+90c8BH6Tnc3L0qg_0gk9d_hEGM2hSP+_4sQ5mOwRasEcQqA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF+90c8BH6Tnc3L0qg_0gk9d_hEGM2hSP+_4sQ5mOwRasEcQqA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 14:24:18 +0300
Message-ID: <CA+hqhpdA_44rXtOzzLv1vFfXB5mn=OOjzsx1+6D6_o0mtMSM+g@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][Draft] Body-less __construct
From: weirdan@gmail.com (Bruce Weirdan)

> If we allow it, I would restrict it to specifically the case of a) a
> promoted constructor b) which has *only* promoted parameters. I don't think
> we should allow replacing "{}" with ";" for methods in the general case.

It could also be useful when you want to make sure constructor is
*not* defined, e.g.
```
    private final function __construct();
```
(often seen in singleton implementations).

-- 
  Best regards,
      Bruce Weirdan                                     mailto:weirdan@gmail.com