Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:114362 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 76369 invoked from network); 11 May 2021 03:40:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 11 May 2021 03:40:49 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D3B1804B1 for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 20:48:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-pl1-f169.google.com (mail-pl1-f169.google.com [209.85.214.169]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 20:48:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-f169.google.com with SMTP id p17so10145115plf.12 for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 20:48:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:references:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RTpIar0Ejtnor9n7vS9Aot7KsziZSQjTVTztpnHWrvo=; b=mc13QFXE9HwXdVZuA9Mg0AW2s7v/emXNVh8q8nPyKx8pwoWV4SMdEd6NE2acoHBLDT zlhQ6bp8K3E1UAzz82vE5tpGcIGmrX2C/BTd5hHx5vRh0lN2+wqzKog1O9qA/cY8nRVN Ib6xhe2mWmo7lt26rYQoxvMTeGyOD3GSyusJ8zf55dpzy9BtDK14E75HeBnf+UmRIUjc nl5LsmoHW7L1nvZD6+Uf53KPxs0u81K32nSALrKgdOuhfRSpmcEDhK/PylEsj+TRVGR6 S6pFvDH9VremwrZSQI0W+lCdArOempGAz6muJ96YloMipw+7tnt6UNOF+2FMuPuxx1pi dzIQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:references:from:subject:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=RTpIar0Ejtnor9n7vS9Aot7KsziZSQjTVTztpnHWrvo=; b=Owfkr+3Ub/rjOT9rVqT0IewAjZYHqifwlgpX9azvjj55d5qobuhx8TsB3JfHW/4fod JYJsbyq8izWEPDngeoZjbnX2EwqmYAI7m67fpMmUzkOO2VaOnIX2dijxbVtQNXSMyug8 omLvSW2qY3HvmtdB2UnH27n3sJ8xNZI9IBVyVrv8Ym6mFiU/ukeCeCJEL7kgV8pZCYOt CASf7Ag0gLD4eiZTBjhbLFZCMjtgvrMZTb3URLGsM8o5Z0XQtxwrEYe5lPFsYTrYThSN 2R3mpYUqNqa4fQkV66CPkrE7M44vBHfmTCy0+DCE5AGE7H2d/J7xqJrhijBuuSp/tAaI IJVg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533VPQuN+20AKsmstIJZX+kTfECthBKtkx1qGRLYzw/YXsRiH/My 0JzYoph5yYt/u7B6tQiUgO424q0hi45O X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwjG0oExaUb+mrbryOJkZ7aNvILcZuixh9LgDzvUCtxLYRMtsN4vLjQ9LSAnM8sPdEXXN+W/Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:358b:: with SMTP id mm11mr30594768pjb.61.1620704907134; Mon, 10 May 2021 20:48:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ip-192-168-8-2.us-west-2.compute.internal ([2601:646:8d80:9130::380c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l6sm12085423pgc.68.2021.05.10.20.48.26 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 10 May 2021 20:48:26 -0700 (PDT) To: internals@lists.php.net References: <20210510220047.GB16258@phcomp.co.uk> Message-ID: <420b3f5a-5ac1-301e-f4f3-a53a99a93324@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 20:48:26 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Could we drop the bottom-posting rule? From: smalyshev@gmail.com (Stanislav Malyshev) Hi! > No I don't agree.  People can do whatever is convenient for them.  Some > will top-post; Some will bottom-post and some will inter-post.  By > interpost I mean people will try to respond to a post on a point by > point basis. The thing is when you alone, you're free to do what is convenient to you and ignore the rest. However, here we have a community that needs to communicate, and we may want to make it convenient to others to read our messages, sometimes to people that are new to the discussion and need some context to understand and participate. And our experience on this list shows that top-posting does not serve this goal. So we decided to ask people to not top-post. -- Stas Malyshev smalyshev@gmail.com