Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:114358 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 53733 invoked from network); 10 May 2021 22:07:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 10 May 2021 22:07:55 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E9C1804E3 for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 15:15:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 15:15:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A5955C0118 for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 18:15:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap8 ([10.202.2.58]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 10 May 2021 18:15:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=P5bPyc5La8jqUpeZV4A/1dNru+gkkeEGQOJuNonqb ZA=; b=olax5oMg1RmwVtlmf124ekuvBBxeUMr5k3E2PZo8xDefPINAwH+wvw7hW o2erFC+8BREGiDq23VGp1ZPAEE+ExTsquYHiQJv/s6u4BaogV1x5JBJ8oEE4s+m6 pTBcnn8t649bcXiZAzzBzoyTc7S+tKeXX3I3rzv/ngfW5VeKI0AiMjgD8P2wHEoK U81JjjXNjLDynI3zAHgPjkk3oIF4sTuRBEWnoV/XqzRuJdqv1e4FuVWCsFMaZsjT WiNjY05YwXmIzFNaaXhsdkx+v5zDIkCAW1JZfcWFuMRVUP/cyqPAoFYCuqqw2jew xPSwe5baljYHfSxs3+3lJjLoJPgAQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdegledgtdelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgfgsehtqhertderreejnecuhfhrohhmpedfnfgr rhhrhicuifgrrhhfihgvlhgufdcuoehlrghrrhihsehgrghrfhhivghlughtvggthhdrtg homheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepffffffejffdugfegvedviedttedvgfejffefffej leefjeetveehgefhhfdvgfelnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpe hmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgrrhhrhiesghgrrhhfihgvlhguthgvtghhrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8D7833A04D9; Mon, 10 May 2021 18:15:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-448-gae190416c7-fm-20210505.004-gae190416 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <26ede224-a661-4e99-8df5-526fca1790a8@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20210510220047.GB16258@phcomp.co.uk> Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 17:15:10 -0500 To: "php internals" Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Could we drop the bottom-posting rule? From: larry@garfieldtech.com ("Larry Garfield") On Mon, May 10, 2021, at 5:08 PM, =F0=9F=98=89 Good Guy =F0=9F=98=89 wro= te: > On 10/05/2021 23:00, Alain D D Williams wrote: > > Please do not change - keep bottom posting. >=20 >=20 > No I don't agree.=C2=A0 People can do whatever is convenient for them.= =C2=A0 Some=20 > will top-post; Some will bottom-post and some will inter-post.=C2=A0 B= y=20 > interpost I mean people will try to respond to a post on a point by=20= > point basis. >=20 > Frankly anything is acceptable to people as long as it gives a coheren= t=20 > answer that is convincing! >=20 >=20 > People should learn to trim some part of the post that they are not=20= > responding to like I have done here. It's true that all three methods have their pros and cons. The real pro= blem comes when mixing both in the same thread, which gets stupidly conf= using. In practice, inter-posting and bottom-posting are more mutually compatib= le, I find, than trying to mix inter-posting with top posting. I usuall= y interpost myself, which is more compatible with bottom-posting. --Larry Garfield