Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:114119 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 84509 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2021 12:52:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 24 Apr 2021 12:52:42 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD99B1804DC for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 05:56:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from processus.org (ns366368.ip-94-23-14.eu [94.23.14.201]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 05:56:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from authenticated-user (PRIMARY_HOSTNAME [PUBLIC_IP]) by processus.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5B6D35101324; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 12:56:09 +0000 (UTC) To: Saif Eddin Gmati , PHP Internals References: Message-ID: <5b9f1500-615a-48f1-815f-1d48b327ef90@processus.org> Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2021 14:56:07 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Authentication-Results: processus.org; auth=pass smtp.auth=pierre-php@processus.org smtp.mailfrom=pierre-php@processus.org X-Spamd-Bar: / Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC][Draft] Sealed Classes From: pierre-php@processus.org (Pierre) Le 24/04/2021 à 12:55, Saif Eddin Gmati a écrit : > Hello Internals, > > I'm sending this email to open discussion about sealed classes, > interfaces, and traits feature for PHP 8.1. > > I have create a Draft RFC here: > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/sealed_classes > > > A major concern for few people have been the syntax, in which it > introduces 2 new keywords into the languages, therefor, i have added a > section about alternative syntax which could be used to avoid this > problem. > > Regards, > > Saif. Hello, And why not using an attribute, such as in HackLang ? Regards, -- Pierre