Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:114080 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 41221 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2021 09:24:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 20 Apr 2021 09:24:00 -0000 Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F9581804BD for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 02:26:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Envelope-From: Received: from mail-pf1-f174.google.com (mail-pf1-f174.google.com [209.85.210.174]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 02:26:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-f174.google.com with SMTP id i190so25122634pfc.12 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 02:26:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yVSONEINea+SR7Wc6OfqY/P/IZpxKxpU5U3zbsXcyAM=; b=Jg6P8S0y+vUqFotBJokwAuLjgwWCFJl8LNYh2Gp7xaqciVWhNCOfv3bmhRSLL1wxxR 9rQEv0UTpdOM5yzbercCzTty3nkkEq8DO75g4LIgWQ9MswazWGobryGZlGdJg1bHQVrJ 77JX+oVfGvZrBaLw1oN9154UFS7SyjDhYISUydCug9/X6Q8KIxYIsFLSKG3UM/jod1dm xoeKFRvK/aucQ4BLeqMVsFL//kjZZq8DXpcl0/S+x4OonpBjwGAL6H82FtKosEP9vHi8 cq8OZX4yL5wLnOzKXTNVy3FOjghwu7jb3eqOARsyzkiiqI26aPEKTPhtUP8y08BLFZiU vc3Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yVSONEINea+SR7Wc6OfqY/P/IZpxKxpU5U3zbsXcyAM=; b=pp19M5ah/8j2hd4Pi55tSu4n02Jjq5K7vafG6kZrMCoeijIdXoVZhwoNjkEG3sLwDJ t4FFoJ1aj6VR1W/imfh+1kyhRB5QeCfvtcVC4FTIiWTGrJAJbOjfSKiYNvhwXF2j53jk ALttEO/N01V//ezMkMSSsPuFXYrnPgVzvo/6tLSzJW1jE8ihnx2nlrqQ64nX3g5w77L3 +n3LzW4IxsRCZZS9LhNgHkPtMb8EQKikHXO5ueSB8ViMLZ66GkgpcsSHKgDtqgI5/r4M /T/Z7C/JkO+SDzCjNxVgV1aj/jsedghQnOYGKtozeEwqMplk4VubAWsHN/U9atYrr19K PeIw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533XvC6LnPzQEGasoU+PVMVkukRjBGztQxj6WKjs6pVAvw0dAxOk zSGMhvLXbbTihWaBuejb0KBVIwX5YaVqW3yyOfP4O5vnMiE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzRnQpy6KmuESJT8dWwAwKr04p5shwgWFPcih7oJyqbrn90k+ZfiljKtpOOd03xGsB9IQyQzJUCJyX6uds65Lc= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:95aa:0:b029:256:143:e5d8 with SMTP id a10-20020aa795aa0000b02902560143e5d8mr23511503pfk.67.1618910789394; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 02:26:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <004701d73549$6dbc9840$4935c8c0$@jhdxr.com> In-Reply-To: <004701d73549$6dbc9840$4935c8c0$@jhdxr.com> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:26:18 +0200 Message-ID: To: CHU Zhaowei Cc: PHP Internals List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000086676305c0640a8c" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [Draft] Final constants From: kocsismate90@gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?TcOhdMOpIEtvY3Npcw==?=) --00000000000086676305c0640a8c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > Can I ask why you use late static binding while you don't want your > constant value to be changed/overridden by child classes? IMHO, `self::FOO` > is all you need. > Personally, I don't use late static binding with class constants since the coding standard rule I previously referenced forbids this, but I don't think a coding style rule should be our only possibility to disallow constant overriding. After learning about the strange behavior Nikita pointed out, final constants would be even more useful than what I initially thought. --00000000000086676305c0640a8c--