Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:114062
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFPFaMJgxrw5t=cV15YHNBZ=cyU-mZLv8EHiLhDgML3Vws2TZA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFPFaM+RGCH1Yvb3ekdy3EY8441z79y+_OsH-th7SvLAa6O9sQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJmy8YHQsjT5RPTGwZJGKsUP3nMxLpagrewAmr40MkoJWQg1PA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJmy8YHQsjT5RPTGwZJGKsUP3nMxLpagrewAmr40MkoJWQg1PA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2021 16:43:48 +0200
Message-ID: <CAF+90c8vYJbRReVw1zkE=4Q9NPKRPwCt_aG7DNQ3QpWnixy5ag@mail.gmail.com>
To: Hans Henrik Bergan <divinity76@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c8634d05c02c206f"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Deprecate implicit non-integer-compatible float
 to int conversions
From: nikita.ppv@gmail.com (Nikita Popov)

--000000000000c8634d05c02c206f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 4:30 PM Hans Henrik Bergan <divinity76@gmail.com>
wrote:

> just want to double check, 1.000000000000009 will then be an incompatible
> cast to int(1), right? because the  0.000000000000009 will be lost?
>

That's right. Something to keep in mind is that your example could have
just as well been 0.9999999999999999 -- which is going to be 0 when cast to
an integer, not 1. A "negligible" difference of 10^-16 in a float can
easily become a difference of 1 when interpreted as an integer.

Nikita


> On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 at 13:41, G. P. B. <george.banyard@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 at 12:39, G. P. B. <george.banyard@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello internals,
> > >
> > > It's been a couple of weeks and no further comments have been made as
> > such
> > > voting is now open:
> > >
> > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/implicit-float-int-deprecate
> > >
> > > It will run for two weeks until the 14th of April 2021.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > George P. Banyard
> > >
> >
> > I'm happy to announce that this RFC has been unanimously approved with 29
> > votes in favor and 0 against.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > George P. Banyard
> >
>

--000000000000c8634d05c02c206f--