Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:114054
Return-Path: <tekiela246@gmail.com>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 7856 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2021 13:54:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5)
  by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 14 Apr 2021 13:54:40 -0000
Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 198D01804E2
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 06:55:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,
	FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,
	SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Virus: No
X-Envelope-From: <tekiela246@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qk1-f173.google.com (mail-qk1-f173.google.com [209.85.222.173])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 06:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-f173.google.com with SMTP id d15so8457940qkc.9
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 06:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc;
        bh=Z5azzL/W34Np0EHFABCIzNCQcpDE3MkMjHGWVDZPDvA=;
        b=skYeyl/IIiibwKGCY3fEMFYd/M+yya1/GFLgiaXhs2+V5j/qTKbzsEqflS4yC2UFkE
         P0QiH6j+KD1Q1D9iYthYskycCXDLOr9/vKX8WyfiaXCAuc/nI9jpfMjvYOGGU+HHd9tL
         s3WcZ2U5SOj14i3FIPJwrq/u3uXInTvgBUY60sMOt6L6XV4WZUHY1vpSj7V5nOlGkyPg
         +1V8KvquYnVMJX3wA9WgChFzEhm4kez8wzrhZITT4omj5rj0c84kJfxWil8gPoZ+Q2oa
         O64WWpNbFhPohWcCXgK9zVU1oxs7bvTG5cScR6wlK521MQCvUc27mxwCKfgAKuI8hip1
         /4ww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=Z5azzL/W34Np0EHFABCIzNCQcpDE3MkMjHGWVDZPDvA=;
        b=OLpljDL0MSFSQkCgu0Y4vmpSNPTy/K+cBfEDpiwdu0ZslgMh1qmrs+Jc+BKNYXJdK9
         hBCFXXf0yMuwKzU2qpHaMZsp4gOiUuUMXL5JoOUagroK4i20b+br3pvXLlQbAVSJn9tG
         YBuSC0fWyMpUTtfbnHjFgFZu+BuyP35JzC3PC3fU195GGRguLpWfn7t5UhyjB/rCTHVI
         AkG9lj8ebcbs9M2e6gqFzRCtlhvm2wsTbgeZe1JVFY/fEkBjiYMBEQS2bzOm/JfzRBtP
         akxaZtRtNhnWCwAwxGZTTioLz5AYYYnJ//yESyydh/L13Copa8Fzwb4Pho440jukOYMn
         6WUQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530kZFkgYtddmq66uJkV8o8zUR5F2oXZ4G/+MFnV6rc1U/WqWNcs
	7TBMgLb3ZNJPUNPVbJ9ZE1FhXE0uNbFKjfSi/io=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyZ8zDi+sLi6EsQ2QAk0tLhYS1kj4WoL35On3Du9tsMkLYtITEsvD2vZOnUqziGo5zs9buXyv25gMc8ccRbAu8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1033:: with SMTP id a19mr11080540qkk.342.1618408541017;
 Wed, 14 Apr 2021 06:55:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAGBsUrdx6frQ2dYO5F=1swFQCF_ROZrf518Kvkd6gRk9odfqHA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAF+90c_bRoikTYFJxg73H0EVVzh_qnOZOFyG5XZk8Tqevh=pgQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF+90c_bRoikTYFJxg73H0EVVzh_qnOZOFyG5XZk8Tqevh=pgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:55:30 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGBsUrfW894PhEFruQuOyunbwrf2EeGatVEyKxEou0ngW0cu5Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003058a305bfef1afb"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Add fetch_column method to mysqli
From: tekiela246@gmail.com (Kamil Tekiela)

--0000000000003058a305bfef1afb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi Nikita,

>The implementation can be optimized if mysqlnd is used.

Thanks for the suggestion. I tried it but I only see ~1% performance
improvement. I don't think it's worth it.

I see that there is not much interest, so I will keep the RFC simple and
without fetch_all() changes.

I will start voting on this RFC soon if there are no more comments.

Regards,
Kamil

>

--0000000000003058a305bfef1afb--